2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An international ring trial for the sensory evaluation of raw ewes’ milk cheese texture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheeses were scored (Madkor et al, 2000) from 0 to 10 for attributes, which included aroma intensity, flavor (0 = none, 10 = aged), aftertaste (the persistence of positive taste sensations perceived after ingestion; 0 = none, 10 = intense), friability (the capacity of a sample to break up into numerous pieces from the beginning of mastication; 0 = no breaking, 10 = intense breaking), solubility (a sensation which emerges when sample melts extremely fast in the saliva; 0 = no melting, 10 = intense melting; Bàrcenas et al, 2007), and overall acceptability (0 = dislike very much, 10 = like very much). The sensory attributes were discussed with the assessors during the introductory sensory training sessions; paper ballots were used.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheeses were scored (Madkor et al, 2000) from 0 to 10 for attributes, which included aroma intensity, flavor (0 = none, 10 = aged), aftertaste (the persistence of positive taste sensations perceived after ingestion; 0 = none, 10 = intense), friability (the capacity of a sample to break up into numerous pieces from the beginning of mastication; 0 = no breaking, 10 = intense breaking), solubility (a sensation which emerges when sample melts extremely fast in the saliva; 0 = no melting, 10 = intense melting; Bàrcenas et al, 2007), and overall acceptability (0 = dislike very much, 10 = like very much). The sensory attributes were discussed with the assessors during the introductory sensory training sessions; paper ballots were used.…”
Section: Sensory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measuring run was 5.0 mm and the initial force was 0N. The uniaxial compression test was performed in two successive cycles, and textural parameters were calculated as described by Bárcenas et al (2007).…”
Section: Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (Cze)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] In addition, sensory response to a mechanical stimulus of food is nonlinear and is affected by several factors involving adaptation and fatigue, [12] training level of the participants. [13] There are several methods used in the food industry to determine textural properties. Texture profile analysis is one of the methods widely performed to determine hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness, and resilience values of the food products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%