“…Based on the prior studies conducted by the authors ( Han et al, 2017 ; Ba et al, 2019 ; Chai et al, 2020 ; Gong et al, 2020 ), the School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey developed by the National Center for Education Statistics of the United States ( Lessne and Yanez, 2016 ) and the recent reviews of cyberbullying measurements ( Berne et al, 2013 ; Chun et al, 2020 ), we inquired about the involvement of the adolescents in six types of cyberbullying behaviors: mocking, spreading lousy information or rumors, posting private information, threatening others, isolating others, and faking to be others in the cyberspace. For the subjects that were being cyberbullied, we asked the question, “Have your classmates or peers implemented these actions to you since January 2020?” The six statements were “Being mocked, called bad nicknames in cyberspace, including in the social media platforms like Weibo, WeChat, QQ, Tik Tok, or through SMS (short messages) or telephone calls”; “Somebody spread bad news or rumors about you in cyberspace”; “Posted your privacy information or photos or videos in cyberspace intentionally”; “Threatened you in cyberspace in chatting rooms or through social media, SMS”; “Isolated or Excluded you in cyberspace such as online games or chatting”; and “Hacked your online account or faked as you in cyberspace and did bad things.” The original answers to these questions were “never,” “rarely,” “sometimes,” and “frequently,” and we recoded the “never” as not being bullied (0), the “rarely,” “sometimes,” and “frequently” as being bullied in that specific manner (1) in our analysis.…”