Psychology Comes to Halt as Weary Researchers Say the Mind cannot possibly Study Itself.This headline appeared on the pages of the satirical newspaper, The Onion. What makes this headline humorous are the multiple layers of analysis it contains, and the clarity and succinctness with which it presents that which is supposedly unintelligible. In order to see the humor in this headline, the reader has to know about the apparent conflict between objective science and human subjectivity, but crucially, they also have to grasp both at the same time and to be able to flip back and forth between them. Debates within psychology regarding the field's scientific status often more closely resemble the content of The Onion article (with the categorical impossibility of a Bscience of the mind^), than the broader awareness required of The Onion's readers (containing both an appreciation of, and healthy distance to, those challenges). Academic discussions of psychology's scientific status are often artificial and divorced from the more complex picture that practitioners, researchers, and laypersons alike have of the field. Similar to how overuse in academia has lead to the notion of a Bmoot point^shifting from meaning Bthat which is deserving of debate^to Bthat which is not worth debating,^many of the ostensive clashing dichotomies within the science of psychology have become more of an intellectual sparring ground than actual battlefield.In the pages that follow it will be argued that these debates are helpful for better understanding human psychology, but that, like the readers of headline mentioned above, we should rise above them. These debates are important, but only in as far as they shed light on the true object of our concern, human psychological functioning. To this end, we should be cautious so as to not overvalue the methodological and Integr Psych Behav (2016) 50:555-567