2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intersectional approach to energy justice: Individual and collective concerns around wind power on Zapotec land

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point is echoed by Torres Contreras (2022Contreras ( , 2023. Indeed, this issue becomes arguably more complex where indigenous people claim rights to land (O'Neill et al, 2021;Mejía-Montero et al, 2023;Ramasar et al, 2022) or where tribal landownership structures co-exist alongside modern land tenure systems (Capps, 2016). This is why Chandrashekeran argues that "the growing body of scholarship on accumulation by energy dispossession needs to be balanced by attention to the opportunities for benefit-sharing by Indigenous landholding interests.…”
Section: Land Landownership and Renewable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point is echoed by Torres Contreras (2022Contreras ( , 2023. Indeed, this issue becomes arguably more complex where indigenous people claim rights to land (O'Neill et al, 2021;Mejía-Montero et al, 2023;Ramasar et al, 2022) or where tribal landownership structures co-exist alongside modern land tenure systems (Capps, 2016). This is why Chandrashekeran argues that "the growing body of scholarship on accumulation by energy dispossession needs to be balanced by attention to the opportunities for benefit-sharing by Indigenous landholding interests.…”
Section: Land Landownership and Renewable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, this raises questions about the distribution of benefits and burdens and about procedural justice in implementation. On the other hand, this also requires a consideration of justice as recognition that goes beyond the anthropocentric focus and takes into account the multiple entanglements of nature, habitats, and people based on different cultural, historical, and religious backgrounds (Lacey- Barnacle et al, 2020;Ruizde-Oña Plaza, 2020;Mejía-Montero et al, 2023).…”
Section: Critical Remarks On Energy Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the unequal distribution of climate change benefits and burdens is associated with negative emotions and can also increase mental health risks (Norgaard, 2011;Ford and Norgaard, 2019;Lawrence et al, 2022). Energy and other low-carbon sustainability transitions are associated with a wide range of different emotions, from negative emotions such as fear, anger, grief, sadness, frustration, guilt, deprivation, loss, or shame to positive emotions such as desire, interest, hope, pride, or sym-pathy (Hujits, 2018;Martiskainen and Sovacool, 2021;Biddau et al, 2022;Huijts et al, 2022;Hunsberger and Awâsis, 2019), including empathy and recognition of animals capable of suffering and endowed with emotions (Mejía-Montero et al, 2023). Emotions are not static but can change over an individual's lifetime, as well as across different types of energy technologies and different temporal phases of where that technology is located within the socio-technical regime (Martiskainen and Sovacool, 2021).…”
Section: The Role Of Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%