An Intersectional Approach to Equity, Inequity, and Archaeology

Abstract

The year 2020 was an awakening for some. For others, it reiterated the persistent social injustice in the United States. Compelled by these events, 30 diverse individuals came together from January to May 2021 for a semester-long seminar exploring inequity in archaeological practice. The seminar's discussions spotlighted the inequity and social injustices that are deeply embedded within the discipline. However, inequity in archaeology is often ignored or treated narrowly as discrete, if loosely bound, problems. A broad approach to inequity in archaeology revealed injustice to be intersectional, with compounding effects. Through the overarching themes of individual, community, theory, and practice, we (a subset of the seminar's participants) explore inequity and its role in various facets of archaeology, including North–South relations, publication, resource distribution, class differences, accessibility, inclusive theories, service to nonarchaeological communities, fieldwork, mentorship, and more. We focus on creating a roadmap for understanding the intersectionality of issues of inequity and suggesting avenues for continued education and direct engagement. We argue that community-building—by providing mutual support and building alliances—provides a pathway for realizing greater equity in our discipline.

Investigating the Effectiveness of Online Bioarchaeology Education through Participant Survey of a Cohort of International Adult Learners

“…We feel that it is important to reflect on our positionality in this research. “Positionality” refers to the biases, assumptions, and worldviews that researchers bring to their interpretations, which are constantly shaped and reshaped by their identity and beliefs (Holmes 2020; Rivera Prince et al 2022). This research was collaboratively developed and conducted by a multicultural team, including early career, mid-career, and senior career females from New Zealand; an early career male and senior career female from Thailand; and a mid-career female from the European Union.…”

The shifting baseline syndrome as a connective concept for more informed and just responses to global environmental change

“…Science is increasingly recognising it must address imbalances, inequalities and scientific racism. Calls for researchers to build their practice on principles of community—both within and across disciplines—are particularly resonant here, as they highlight how interconnection and an ethic of care will improve equity in science and benefit society (Douglass, 2020; Rivera Prince et al, 2022). The shifting baseline syndrome provides a lens to look inwards.…”

Ready or Not

“…As a discipline, archaeology continues to reconcile with its history of destructive digging and cultural insensitivity (Colwell-Chanthaphonh 2009) while also addressing social issues relevant to the twenty-first century more generally. American archaeology faces calls to diversify the field and the National Register of Historic Places (Flewellen et al 2021; Franklin et al 2020; Gamble et al 2020), tackle pervasive inequity (Rivera Prince et al 2022), address sexual harassment in the field (Colaninno 2019; Meyers et al 2018), and improve public engagement (Bollwerk et al 2015). For decades, archaeology has also faced calls to better prepare students with the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to succeed in the archaeological workforce in the United States.…”