2018
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intersectional perspective on Muslim women's issues and experiences in employment

Abstract: Drawing on a qualitative study of second‐generation Pakistani heritage Muslim women in employment in the UK, this article uses and develops an intersectional perspective to explain the interconnected and overlapping factors, such as gender, ethnicity and religion that affect these women at work. It also considers individual strategies and resources these women use to address any obstacles in the way of their employment and careers. The article uses the notions of inequality regimes and intersectionality to exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ball, 2010; Sewell and Barker, 2006) to expose the cultural embeddedness of surveillance and the various interpretations it is given by those gazed at, our study reveals ultra-Orthodox women’s interpretations of the surveillance mechanisms and demonstrates the cultural embeddedness of the gazing mechanisms; (4) we add to the growing literature on gender-intersectionality by indicating the importance of intersecting surveillance systems as a reflection of the extra-organisational matrix of domination that infiltrates the organisational lives of social minorities, and subjects them to more extensive surveilling systems (Choo and Ferree, 2010; Fotaki and Harding, 2018). In so doing, we also contribute to recent interest in gender-religiosity intersectionality within organisational studies (Tariq and Syed, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ball, 2010; Sewell and Barker, 2006) to expose the cultural embeddedness of surveillance and the various interpretations it is given by those gazed at, our study reveals ultra-Orthodox women’s interpretations of the surveillance mechanisms and demonstrates the cultural embeddedness of the gazing mechanisms; (4) we add to the growing literature on gender-intersectionality by indicating the importance of intersecting surveillance systems as a reflection of the extra-organisational matrix of domination that infiltrates the organisational lives of social minorities, and subjects them to more extensive surveilling systems (Choo and Ferree, 2010; Fotaki and Harding, 2018). In so doing, we also contribute to recent interest in gender-religiosity intersectionality within organisational studies (Tariq and Syed, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While religiosity is often listed as a relevant identity category for studying gender intersectionality (e.g. Tariq and Syed, 2018), organisational studies have yet to explore in depth this important intersection and its consequences. However, assumptions of disenchantment and rationalisation undergird organisations, making the secular, rational man – whose devotion to the organisation is not compromised by religious demands of time and compliance with another authority – the ideal worker.…”
Section: The Matrix Of Visibility Regimes: Towards An Understanding Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While intersectional research tends to be rare in the UK context, there is a small amount of British BAME intersectional scholarship (Atewologun & Sealy, 2014;Atewologun et al, 2016;Atewologun & Singh, 2010;Özbilgin et al, 2010;Showunmi, Atewologun, & Bebbington, 2016;Tariq & Syed, 2018).…”
Section: Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still much of the intersectional research on vocational issues seems to be conducted by scholars outside of vocational psychology (e.g., Collins, Dumas, & Moyer, 2017;Dickens & Chavez, 2018;Harris, 2014;L. T. O'Brien, Blodorn, Adams, Garcia, & Hammer, 2015;Tariq & Syed, 2018;Yu, 2014Yu, , 2016. Several axes of difference also remain underexplored in the intersectional psychological literature, particularly social class, religion, and transgender issues (Ali, Yamada, & Mahmood, 2015; R. M. Lee & Dean, 2004;Reimers & Stabb, 2015), raising issues of inequity in research investment.…”
Section: Five: Enrich Intersectionality In Vocational Psychology Schomentioning
confidence: 99%