2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-014-9365-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intervention framework designed to develop the collaborative problem-solving skills of primary school students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Gu et al's (2015) study, a mind map was designed to scaffold students to make a group plan that included the following sections: problem interpretation, roles of group members, goals, new knowledge and tools needed, timetable, procedure and stages, and possible challenges. For example, in Gu et al's (2015) study, a mind map was designed to scaffold students to make a group plan that included the following sections: problem interpretation, roles of group members, goals, new knowledge and tools needed, timetable, procedure and stages, and possible challenges.…”
Section: Framework For Srdlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in Gu et al's (2015) study, a mind map was designed to scaffold students to make a group plan that included the following sections: problem interpretation, roles of group members, goals, new knowledge and tools needed, timetable, procedure and stages, and possible challenges. For example, in Gu et al's (2015) study, a mind map was designed to scaffold students to make a group plan that included the following sections: problem interpretation, roles of group members, goals, new knowledge and tools needed, timetable, procedure and stages, and possible challenges.…”
Section: Framework For Srdlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualize an overarching goal or structure to guide learners to work through the entire task (a) an overarching question or a set of goals for planning and monitoring: an integrated workspace (Zhang & Quintana, 2012) or goal tree (Manlove et al, 2006) (b) making the activity structure explicit (Veenman et al, 1994;Wu & Pedersen, 2011;Zhang & Quintana, 2012) Improve task understanding Promote SRL B. Introduce or prompt deep process strategies at appropriate moments (a) prompts of rationales or directions (Bulu & Pedersen, 2010;Manlove et al, 2006;Poitras & Lajoie, 2014;Zhang & Quintana, 2012) (b) prompts for activating or encouraging strategies at appropriate moments (Bulu & Pedersen, 2010;Gu et al, 2015;Manlove et al, 2006 ;Zhang & Quintana, 2012) (c) eliciting thoughts (Manlove et al, 2006;Wu & Pedersen, 2011;Zhang & Quintana, 2012) or discussion (Gu et al, 2015) (d) providing standards (criteria) or template for judgment and evaluation (Manlove et al, 2006;Zhang & Quintana, 2012) (e) provide adaptive feedback in time (Poitras & Lajoie, 2014) Improve task understanding Improve strategic knowledge Promote SRL C. Take over irrelevant or routine works by minimizing the workload of mechanical activities (Zhang & Quintana, 2012) Improve cognitive allocation students should have a clear goal in mind to guide them to work through the entire task. In Zhang and Quintana's (2012) study, they ask students to articulate a driving question.…”
Section: Features and Examples Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations