2023
DOI: 10.1007/s40879-023-00637-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introduction to the algebraic geometry of the Putman–Wieland conjecture

Abstract: We give algebraic and geometric perspectives on our prior results toward the Putman–Wieland conjecture. This leads to interesting new constructions of families of “origami” curves whose Jacobians have high-dimensional isotrivial isogeny factors. We also explain how a hyperelliptic analogue of the Putman–Wieland conjecture fails, following work of Marković.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let π0pt:trueΣnormalΣ$\pi \colon \widetilde{\Sigma }\rightarrow \Sigma$ be a finite branched cover between closed oriented surfaces. The homology of normalΣ$\widetilde{\Sigma }$ encodes subtle information about the mapping class group of Σ$\Sigma$, and over the last decade has been intensely studied [5, 9–14, 16–18, 20]. Much of this is motivated by a conjecture of Putman–Wieland [20] we discuss below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let π0pt:trueΣnormalΣ$\pi \colon \widetilde{\Sigma }\rightarrow \Sigma$ be a finite branched cover between closed oriented surfaces. The homology of normalΣ$\widetilde{\Sigma }$ encodes subtle information about the mapping class group of Σ$\Sigma$, and over the last decade has been intensely studied [5, 9–14, 16–18, 20]. Much of this is motivated by a conjecture of Putman–Wieland [20] we discuss below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjecture 1.1 has been proved in a variety of cases; see, for example, [5, 11–14]. However, we know very little about when H1scc(normalΣ;Q)=H1(normalΣ;Q)$\operatorname{H}^{\operatorname{scc}}_1(\widetilde{\Sigma };\mathbb {Q}) = \operatorname{H}_1(\widetilde{\Sigma };\mathbb {Q})$.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%