2006
DOI: 10.1108/13683040610685775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introduction to the Enterprise Risk Scorecard

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce the concept of an Enterprise Risk Scorecard.Design/methodology/approachWith the accelerating growth in global risk levels leading to an intense current demand for risk management solutions, an analysis was conducted on whether a scorecard framework could be applied to risk measurement. This analysis included a survey of Kaplan and Norton's voluminous and seminal writings on the Balanced Scorecard, in which, surprisingly, relatively little on the measurement of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ERM has been found to be positively related to firm performance (Calandro & Lane, 2006;Gordon et al, 2009;Hoyt & Liebenberg, 2011;Callahan & Soileau, 2017;Florio & Leoni, 2017). However, previous studies have focused solely on financial performance (Bartram, 2000;Gordon et al, 2009;Hoyt & Liebenberg, 2011;Quon et al, 2012) rather than on both financial and non-financial performance (Calandro & Lane, 2006;Callahan & Soileau, 2017) because it is easier to compare financial performance calculated to satisfy shareholders', investors', and creditors' requirements. In addition, the reporting of financial performance is a mandatory practice required by law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERM has been found to be positively related to firm performance (Calandro & Lane, 2006;Gordon et al, 2009;Hoyt & Liebenberg, 2011;Callahan & Soileau, 2017;Florio & Leoni, 2017). However, previous studies have focused solely on financial performance (Bartram, 2000;Gordon et al, 2009;Hoyt & Liebenberg, 2011;Quon et al, 2012) rather than on both financial and non-financial performance (Calandro & Lane, 2006;Callahan & Soileau, 2017) because it is easier to compare financial performance calculated to satisfy shareholders', investors', and creditors' requirements. In addition, the reporting of financial performance is a mandatory practice required by law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant for budgeting, which has always been subject to the search for better ways of predicting risks and reducing uncertainty (e.g., Lewis, 1952;Greer, 1954;Hofstede, 1967;Holthausen and Assmus, 1982). There is, in fact, a growing body of literature that highlights the importance of integrating risk with the process of budgeting: some authors have focused on the integration of risk with budget documents and processes (Collier and Berry, 2002); other authors have proposed new integrated tools such as risk scorecards (Scholey, 2006;Calandro and Lane, 2006), key risk indicators (Scandizzo, 2005;Lam, 2006), and risk-based approaches for cost evaluation (Juras, 2007); other authors have instead discussed the need to integrate the risk management process and the planning process while also indicating normative guidelines for integration (McWhorter et al, 2006;Beasley et al, 2006;Beasley and Frigo, 2007). Finally, Collier et al (2007) have offered empirical evidence of current practices, with a survey of organisations in the UK.…”
Section: Information That Explicitly Deals With Riskmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reference [25] introduces the concept of an Enterprise Risk Scorecard. They designing a risk scorecard based on Kaplan and Norton's BSC.…”
Section: Related Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%