2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introductory review of cellular automata modeling of moving grain boundaries in polycrystalline materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The grain growth kinetic equation has also been established by Beck et al [70]. Experimental results suggest that the grain-size distribution is approximately log-normal for normal grain growth [71,72].…”
Section: Ca Model For Normal Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The grain growth kinetic equation has also been established by Beck et al [70]. Experimental results suggest that the grain-size distribution is approximately log-normal for normal grain growth [71,72].…”
Section: Ca Model For Normal Grain Growthmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These features indicate that it is possible to model the microstructure evolution within a unified frame [64][65][66]. In contrast to the limited applicability of the macro-scale models, e.g., the phenomenological model and the statistical model, this characteristic of mesoscopic models also shows the latent advantage of the numerical solution of the complexity of microstructural evolution globally , such as normal grain growth [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76], recrystallization [82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] and phase transformation [100][101][102][103]. 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the location of the interface can be obtained by determining the cells where the solid fraction varies from 0 to 1. As a result, the CA method can capture complex interfacial dynamics with great efficiency and its computational requirements (memory and time) are much lower than other methods such as phase-field methods [19]. A review of CA modeling of microstructural evolution has been presented by Janssens [19] and He et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the CA method can capture complex interfacial dynamics with great efficiency and its computational requirements (memory and time) are much lower than other methods such as phase-field methods [19]. A review of CA modeling of microstructural evolution has been presented by Janssens [19] and He et al [20]. It has been used for modeling structural evolution during solidification [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A basic feature of this method is to distribute nodes randomly in the domain instead of using regular cells, which leads to different distances between the nodes and different neighborhood configurations for each of them. This new approach was first proposed by Janssens for modelling the re-crystallisation (Janssens, 2000(Janssens, , 2003(Janssens, , 2010Raabe et al, 2007). were the first to couple the classical CA method with a meshless method instead of the FEM or FDM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%