2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2015.7158098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An intrusion detection system against malicious attacks on the communication network of driverless cars

Abstract: Vehicular ad hoc networking (VANET) have become a significant technology in the current years because of the emerging generation of self-driving cars such as Google driverless cars. VANET have more vulnerabilities compared to other networks such as wired networks, because these networks are an autonomous collection of mobile vehicles and there is no fixed security infrastructure, no high dynamic topology and the open wireless medium makes them more vulnerable to attacks. It is important to design new approache… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuzzy sets are increasingly popular to tackle such problems efficiently [38] and will thus be employed to address the problem of classification using a fuzzification of the features that were obtained from the ns-2 trace file. Our previous work [39] did not employ fuzzy sets and we obtained a false alarm rate of 12.24%. After incorporating fuzzy sets, we obtain a false alarm rate of 0.17% [25].…”
Section: Fuzzification Of the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fuzzy sets are increasingly popular to tackle such problems efficiently [38] and will thus be employed to address the problem of classification using a fuzzification of the features that were obtained from the ns-2 trace file. Our previous work [39] did not employ fuzzy sets and we obtained a false alarm rate of 12.24%. After incorporating fuzzy sets, we obtain a false alarm rate of 0.17% [25].…”
Section: Fuzzification Of the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the IDS, we need to compare it with the previous best achieved average error rate, which is 2.05% [39], while we have achieved an 0.18% error rate with the IDS presented here. In [39], the average of false alarm is 4.68%, while we have achieved 0.15% with this IDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, incapable (damaged, etc.) or hacked vehicles could potentially send false information mistakenly or maliciously to one another (Alheeti, Gruebler, & McDonald‐Maier, ). At a larger scale, cyber terrorism such as a large‐scale immobilization of vehicles (Yeomans, ) may lead to relatively unquantifiable and uninsurable risks.…”
Section: Emerging Technology Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However different threshold functions are utilized to define the reliability or unreliability of the neighborhood nodes. Alheeti et al (2015) worked on detection system for malicious nodes in VANET. The work developed a real-time revelation and isolation of the malignant vehicles.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%