2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.11.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An invariant Harnack inequality for a class of subelliptic operators under global doubling and Poincaré assumptions, and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the results in Theorem 1.3 are established, we consider some possible applications. Firstly, in Section 7 we deal with potential-theoretic properties of L. Indeed, the estimates of Γ and the presence of a blowing-up pole (see (V) in Theorem 1.3) allow us to verify, for our operators L, all the axioms of potential theory required for the analysis contained in the series of papers [1,2,4,12]. Secondly, in Section 8 we shall show that the kernel k (x, y) = X x i X x j Γ (x; y) satisfies, globally in R n , the so-called standard estimates of singular integrals, together with a suitable cancelation property, with respect to both variables.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the results in Theorem 1.3 are established, we consider some possible applications. Firstly, in Section 7 we deal with potential-theoretic properties of L. Indeed, the estimates of Γ and the presence of a blowing-up pole (see (V) in Theorem 1.3) allow us to verify, for our operators L, all the axioms of potential theory required for the analysis contained in the series of papers [1,2,4,12]. Secondly, in Section 8 we shall show that the kernel k (x, y) = X x i X x j Γ (x; y) satisfies, globally in R n , the so-called standard estimates of singular integrals, together with a suitable cancelation property, with respect to both variables.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the second inequality in (3) holds, the proof is completed. Thus we suppose S Ω (B θR , f ) < εαcγ p M0 which implies (4) S Ω (B r (ỹ), f ) < εαcγ p M 0 for every B r (ỹ) ⊆ B θR .…”
Section: Abstract Harnack Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We now define suitable sublevel sets of a specific functions g and h in which we are able to construct barriers to prove the critical density and the double ball property respectively. We construct these functions modifying the fundamental solution Γ(x, 0) = x 4 1 + 4x 2 2…”
Section: Application To Grushin Type Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, we drop our previous hypoellipticity assumptions (HY) and (HY) ε , in favor of more geometrical hypotheses. We shall skip any detail here, referring the interested reader to [8].…”
Section: An Invariant Harnack Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%