2014
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-014-0434-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse analysis method based on deflection to curvature transformation to determine the tensile properties of UHPFRC

Abstract: The determination of the tensile properties of such a deflection hardening response material as UHPFRC is a serious challenge for both researchers and designers. This process involves many factors, such as specimen size, fibre orientation or test typology. The socalled inverse analysis is used to obtain the tensile constitutive properties that are consistent with the specimen response in a bending test. This work focuses on the inverse analysis process. The main aim is to develop a new back-calculation methodo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The great disadvantage of flexural tests is that an inverse analysis is required to determine the constitutive law of the material in tension. According to [53], due to UHPFRC strain-hardening response (high strain capacity before crack localization), the characterization of the material by means of the tensile stress-strain curve is more appropriate than the stress -crack opening displacement (COD) approach adopted for FRC. An inverse analysis methodology for UHPFRC, based on four-point bending tests, is proposed in [54].…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The great disadvantage of flexural tests is that an inverse analysis is required to determine the constitutive law of the material in tension. According to [53], due to UHPFRC strain-hardening response (high strain capacity before crack localization), the characterization of the material by means of the tensile stress-strain curve is more appropriate than the stress -crack opening displacement (COD) approach adopted for FRC. An inverse analysis methodology for UHPFRC, based on four-point bending tests, is proposed in [54].…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unnotched four-point bending tests were performed by [53] to determine UHPFRC stress-strain response by means of a loadcurvature method. In compression, a linear stress evolution is assumed.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four-point bending tests were performed on prisms of size 100 × 100 × 500 mm 3 , with the loading points at beam length thirds, and the deflection at mid-span being measured by two displacement transducers on the front and back sides. The tensile response was obtained from the load vs deflection curves while using the simplified inverse analysis method that was proposed in [21,22]. This tensile constitutive model is defined by the parameters: elastic modulus (E), cracking strength (f t ), ultimate cracking strength (f tu ), and its associated strain (ε tu ).…”
Section: Flexural-tensile Strength Of Uhfprcsmentioning
confidence: 99%