Recent Contributions to Fluid Mechanics 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81932-2_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Inverse Integral Computational Method for Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of evaluating such integrals numerically at each streamwise location, the calculation can be made using the correlation of D in terms of the local edge Mach number, shape factor and skin friction coefficient' 13 '. The result of using an analytical correlation as opposed to numerically evaluating Equation 6is an increase in speed of O (10).…”
Section: Viscous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of evaluating such integrals numerically at each streamwise location, the calculation can be made using the correlation of D in terms of the local edge Mach number, shape factor and skin friction coefficient' 13 '. The result of using an analytical correlation as opposed to numerically evaluating Equation 6is an increase in speed of O (10).…”
Section: Viscous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations 3 and 5 can be arranged to (Whitfield, et al, 1982 The boundary layer calculations are performed separately on the upper and lower airfoil surfaces. The stagnation point is located.…”
Section: Jnverse Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One type of zonal method used for inviscid-viscous interaction is an inviscid flow solution method for the flow away from the body matched to a viscous or boundary layer flow solution method for the flow near the body. For steady airfoil calculations, extensive inviscid-viscous interaction methods have been developed, for example Whitfield, et al (1982). The boundary layer computational methods are either finite difference or integral methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%