2020
DOI: 10.1002/oca.2686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse optimal approach to design of feedback control: Exploring analytical solutions for the Hamilton‐Jacobi‐Bellman equation

Abstract: Summary Design of feedback control by an optimal control approach relies on the solutions of the Hamilton‐Jacobi‐Bellman (HJB) equation, while this equation rarely admits analytical solutions for arbitrary choices of the performance measure. An inverse optimal feedback design approach is proposed here in which analytical solutions are explored for the HJB equation that optimize some meaningful, but not necessarily ideal, performance measure. Such performance measure is exclusively selected from a family of cos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the mathematical notation () + indicates the Moore-Penrose inverse. 41 Remark 5. Theorem 1 meets Lagrange's form of D'Alembert's principle, and it formalizes the minimum constraint force rendering constraints (18) to be satisfied.…”
Section: Assumption 2 the Inertia Matrix H(x(t) 𝛿(T) T) Is Positive D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the mathematical notation () + indicates the Moore-Penrose inverse. 41 Remark 5. Theorem 1 meets Lagrange's form of D'Alembert's principle, and it formalizes the minimum constraint force rendering constraints (18) to be satisfied.…”
Section: Assumption 2 the Inertia Matrix H(x(t) 𝛿(T) T) Is Positive D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem Assume the uncertainty set δ(t) is known and Assumptions and are always satisfied in the underactuated mechanical system ( ). The control force Qc (i.e., constraint force) rendering the nominal system ( ) to satisfy servo constraints ( ) for all (x,x˙,t)Rn×Rn×R can be represented as : Qc(x,x˙,t)=((x,t)H1(x,t)B)+[b(x,x˙,t)+(x,t)H1(x,t)(C(x,x˙,t)x˙+T(x,x˙,t))], where the mathematical notation ()+ indicates the Moore–Penrose inverse 41 …”
Section: Underactuated Mechanical Systems With Fuzzy Evidence Number ...mentioning
confidence: 99%