2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-011-9835-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse problem in reaction kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further analyze how the following modifications-the absolute Newton step and the Armijo second-order line search-influence frequency of convergence. To estimate the influence, provided by the absolute Newton step, we calculate a quantity of absolute = [total percent of points converged to global solution given the absolute Newton step modification (options 5-8, 10) is used] -[total percent of points converged to global solution given the modification is not used (options [1][2][3][4]9)]. For example, the influence provided by the absolute Newton step for the A → B → C reaction is A→B→C = [50 + 50 + 63 + 63 + 38]% -[38 + 38 + 50 + 50 + 25]% = 264% -201% = 63%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We further analyze how the following modifications-the absolute Newton step and the Armijo second-order line search-influence frequency of convergence. To estimate the influence, provided by the absolute Newton step, we calculate a quantity of absolute = [total percent of points converged to global solution given the absolute Newton step modification (options 5-8, 10) is used] -[total percent of points converged to global solution given the modification is not used (options [1][2][3][4]9)]. For example, the influence provided by the absolute Newton step for the A → B → C reaction is A→B→C = [50 + 50 + 63 + 63 + 38]% -[38 + 38 + 50 + 50 + 25]% = 264% -201% = 63%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, multiple solutions may exist due to nonuniqueness of the kinetic model itself: Different chemical networks can account for the same experimental data, a well‐known external factor . Santosa and Weitz state the problem: “The mathematical model of the kinetic system leads to a system of ordinary differential equations…It is possible for a system involving multiple species with different reaction rates to lead to exactly the same set of differential equations.” Balogh et al have conducted a detailed study on this topic and state that kinetic schemes involving consecutive (first‐order) reactions can be easily confused with those involving reversible second‐order or pseudo–first‐order reactions. They note that if there exist several kinetic schemes describing experimental data equally well, then it is not possible to choose the right model without additional chemical information, for example, knowledge of the stoichiometry, the number of absorbing species, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kerner Polynomialization and Ψ Kow ) are proven to fully preserve deterministic dynamics, thus there is no point in using approximate expansions (which provide approximate dynamics and does not even aim for full preservation of information) for chemical inversion if even precise methods available do not succeed in preserving deterministic expectations in the chemical simulation. However, deterministic dynamics are known to manifest differently in stochastic settings 3 , and it may very well turn out that series expansions are more optimal for chemical inversion.…”
Section: Closing Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This induces the second category of inverse problems, where a set of desirable properties are provided (such as time series realizations), and compatible reaction networks are constructed. It has been shown that unique inversion is impossible in deterministic settings, due to differing reaction networks translating into identical ODE systems describing their dynamics [3]. However, a general inversion framework for designing any reaction network compatible with any desired property of interest has yet to be presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%