2012
DOI: 10.11139/cj.29.2.269-296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation into Reported Differences B e tween Online Foreign L anguage Instruction and Other Subject Areas in a Virtual School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is even more worrisome, given that self‐regulation is impacted by learner motivation, that 62% of online enrollments in virtual schools fall into the category of credit recovery (Queen & Lewis, ), a category that frequently overlaps with poorly motivated students. A recent study of North Carolina Virtual Public School prompts a further concern: Oliver, Kellogg, and Patel () report that students enrolled in foreign language courses at the school had significantly lower perceptions of their online course than students taking other subjects had of theirs, while just 19% of intermediate and advanced foreign language students perceived that they learned as much online as they did in offline courses.…”
Section: K–12 Online Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is even more worrisome, given that self‐regulation is impacted by learner motivation, that 62% of online enrollments in virtual schools fall into the category of credit recovery (Queen & Lewis, ), a category that frequently overlaps with poorly motivated students. A recent study of North Carolina Virtual Public School prompts a further concern: Oliver, Kellogg, and Patel () report that students enrolled in foreign language courses at the school had significantly lower perceptions of their online course than students taking other subjects had of theirs, while just 19% of intermediate and advanced foreign language students perceived that they learned as much online as they did in offline courses.…”
Section: K–12 Online Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding supports national survey research by Gill et al (2015) that found only 21% of the 127 surveyed full-time online programs reported that they frequently facilitated "collaborative learning involving two or more students working together" (p. 10). Previous research has highlighted that collaborative online courses lose some of the advantages of self-paced instruction and make it more difficult for students to learn and master the content at a pace independent of other students (DiPietro, Ferdig, Black, & Preston, 2008;Oliver et al, 2010). Teachers are often asked to provide students with the best from both worlds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the flexibility inherent in "virtual collaboration … addresses many of the difficulties inherent in traditional, face-to-face collaborative efforts" (Jones & Green, 2012, p. 27), collaborative learning opportunities appear to be less common online than in face-to-face environments and can vary across content areas (Kozma et al, 2000). For instance, Oliver, Kellogg, and Patel's (2010) quantitative case study found that online math students reported significantly fewer opportunities for group collaboration than online students in other content areas. This appeared to be a result of the visual nature of math and the need for synchronous communication.…”
Section: Collaboratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies suggest that this discrepancy in outcomes is explained by an interaction between instructional modality and a student's prior performance, producing different outcomes for online students of different skill levels (Bigelow, 2009;Lu & Lemonde, 2013;Driscoll, Jicha, Hunt, Tichavsky, & Thompson, 2017). Understanding what leads to student success in F2F and online sections is especially important in mathematics courses, where students have been shown to perform even more poorly than other subjects in online sections (Oliver, Kellogg, & Patel, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%