1997
DOI: 10.1177/002224299706100306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation into the Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in a Personal Selling Context

Abstract: The authors report the results of two studies that attempt to model antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. They draw the antecedents from extant research and propose that the willingness to perform organizational citizenship behaviors is related to the job-related perceptions of the degree of organizational fit between the salesperson and his or her firm, level of leadership support, perceived fairness in reward allocation (i.e., distributive justice), and job satisf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
267
0
27

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
12
267
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Since multiple factors emerged and the first factor did not account for the majority of the variance, a substantial amount of common method variance does not appear to be present (Konrad and Linnehan, 1995;Podsakoff and Organ 1986). Given the limitations of Harman's one-factor test, we used the procedure recommended by Netemeyer and colleagues, involving two structural equation models that include a common method factor (Netemeyer et al, 1997). Our results show that a same source factor does not exist.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Since multiple factors emerged and the first factor did not account for the majority of the variance, a substantial amount of common method variance does not appear to be present (Konrad and Linnehan, 1995;Podsakoff and Organ 1986). Given the limitations of Harman's one-factor test, we used the procedure recommended by Netemeyer and colleagues, involving two structural equation models that include a common method factor (Netemeyer et al, 1997). Our results show that a same source factor does not exist.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The widely used Harman's one-factor method (e.g., Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, and Podsakoff, 2003;Podsakoff and Organ, 1986) shows no evidence of a dominant common factor, providing preliminary support that common method bias does not represent a serious issue for this study. Furthermore, Netemeyer, Boles, McKee, and McMurrian (1997) suggest that a same-source factor should be added to the indicators of each construct. Then, two models are compared to one another: a model where the same-source factor loadings are constrained to zero with a model where the same-source factor loadings are estimated freely.…”
Section: Assessment Of Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is the first empirical attempt of its kind to analyze the influence of volunteerism on service-oriented variables such as OCB mediated by affectivity. Another advantage of this study is its usage of data from sales personnel, the supervisors, and the customers, which minimizes the risk of common method variance (CMV) bias (Netemeyer, Boles, MacKee, & MacMurrian, 1997). CMV bias was tested using the methodology proposed by Malhotra, Kim, & Patil (2006) and its effects were not significant.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%