2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the effects of label noise on Dynamic Selection algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They consider that instances with the kDN greater than 0.8 (using k = 5) should not be considered since the 80% of their neighbors are not from their same class and, therefore, are noisy instances that can potentially harm the system. In [31], they carried out an analysis of how noise affects the performance of Dynamic Selection algorithms. They used the kDN to avoid noisy instances by giving more probability to be selected to the instances having a lower value of the kDN .…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They consider that instances with the kDN greater than 0.8 (using k = 5) should not be considered since the 80% of their neighbors are not from their same class and, therefore, are noisy instances that can potentially harm the system. In [31], they carried out an analysis of how noise affects the performance of Dynamic Selection algorithms. They used the kDN to avoid noisy instances by giving more probability to be selected to the instances having a lower value of the kDN .…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been successfully applied as a noise filter in an online scheme [23]. In the same way, in [31], the authors employ the kDN by filtering the instances with a high value since they can be safely discarded because they are either noisy instances or outliers. Other works utilize the kDN as a guide for informed sampling to improve the performance of classification models [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%