2006
DOI: 10.4219/jaa-2006-346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation Into the Gender and Age Differences in the Social Coping of Academically Advanced Students

Abstract: Background of the StudyDuring adolescence, individuals undergo a series of critical changes that allow them to understand their world, and themselves, in more complex and sophisticated ways (Keating, 2004). The cognitive advancements that typically occur during this time, such as the development of deductive reasoning and the improved ability to think abstractly and metacognitively, are related to both a heightened sense of self-awareness, a better understanding of what makes one unique, and the development In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, most literature on social coping assumes that all gifted students experience their giftedness in similar ways. Some research (e.g., Foust, Rudasill, & Callahan, 2006) explores differences in social coping strategies by age and gender, but largely, research and practices in gifted education emphasize the similarities among gifted students over their intragroup differences. This study acknowledges the different experiences and multifaceted identities of gifted students who belong to more than one minority group.…”
Section: Implications For Gifted Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most literature on social coping assumes that all gifted students experience their giftedness in similar ways. Some research (e.g., Foust, Rudasill, & Callahan, 2006) explores differences in social coping strategies by age and gender, but largely, research and practices in gifted education emphasize the similarities among gifted students over their intragroup differences. This study acknowledges the different experiences and multifaceted identities of gifted students who belong to more than one minority group.…”
Section: Implications For Gifted Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Okrem týchto prác jestvujú aj ďalšie štúdie, ktoré hovoria v kontexte nadaných žiakov o adaptívnych zvládacích stratégiách (napr. Cohen & Frydenberg, 2005;Foust et al, 2006;Preuss & Dubow, 2004).…”
Section: Zvládanie Bežných a Intelektovo Nadaných Adolescentovunclassified
“…Swiatek (2001) found a negative relationship between denying the influence of giftedness on peer acceptance and selfconcept (particularly of peer relationships), but Chan (2003Chan ( , 2004 found it to be positively related to emotional intelligence and other indicators of well-being in a Chinese sample. Younger gifted students are less likely to consider popularity important than older students (Chan, 2004(Chan, , 2005Foust, Rudasill, & Callahan, 2006;Swiatek, 2002). Older students may be more likely to help others than their younger peers (Chan, 2005;Foust et al, 2006;Swiatek, 2001).…”
Section: Social Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger gifted students are less likely to consider popularity important than older students (Chan, 2004(Chan, , 2005Foust, Rudasill, & Callahan, 2006;Swiatek, 2002). Older students may be more likely to help others than their younger peers (Chan, 2005;Foust et al, 2006;Swiatek, 2001).…”
Section: Social Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%