2011
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the numbers of dentists from 19 European Economic Area (EEA) member states currently registered to work in the United Kingdom and key differences between the practise of dentistry in the UK and their member states of origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that the ratio of respondents who trained in Europe and the UK was very similar to that reported by Patel et al 15 who found that in 2010, 28% of GDPs registered with the GDC had not qualified in the UK. The sample can therefore be interpreted as representative in this respect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is noteworthy that the ratio of respondents who trained in Europe and the UK was very similar to that reported by Patel et al 15 who found that in 2010, 28% of GDPs registered with the GDC had not qualified in the UK. The sample can therefore be interpreted as representative in this respect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom have reported an increase in the number of dentists migrating from the 2004/07 EU Accession States. For example, between 2007 and 2009, the number of the dentists from Bulgaria and Romania (2007 EU Accession States) contributed to the largest increase in EU dentists registered in the United Kingdom. This movement can have considerable impacts on the poorer and underserved regions of source countries.…”
Section: Migration Flows and Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst cultural proximity can be seen as a driving force behind this migration, further collaboration in terms of trade agreements has also contributed to this cause. The nature of this migration in Australia is somewhat different to the European Union free movement of personnel, where there are known language issues and reported variations in dental education and practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%