1980
DOI: 10.1139/v80-130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the origins of polar substituent effects upon 19F chemical shifts, using 4-substituted β,β-difluorostyrenes

Abstract: 19F, 13C, and 1H chemical shifts have been determined for β,β-difluorostyrene and eight 4-substituted derivatives. The β-fluorine chemical shift difference, ΔδF, is used to evaluate the constant in the Buckingham equation. A = 3.0 × 10−11 esu for C—F bonds which is in excellent agreement with the value derived by Adcock and Khor. This allows accurate estimates of direct field effect contributions to 19F chemical shifts in aryl fluorides. Substituent parameter correlations demonstrate that the primary polar eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many attempts subsequently to provide an experimental value for the coefficient Ā x for fluorine by examination of shifts in conformationally rigid fluorinated molecules. For systems in which the fluorine is attached to an sp 2 carbon atom (usually in an aromatic ring) these efforts have produced values for Ā x in the range 142 to 583 ppm/au field with most near 550 ppm/au field. A semiempirical calculation of Ā x at the INDO level suggested a value of 790 ppm/au field . The value from the theoretical work of Augspurger et al . , mentioned earlier (the one used in the calculations of δ E in our work) is 1885 ppm/au field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been many attempts subsequently to provide an experimental value for the coefficient Ā x for fluorine by examination of shifts in conformationally rigid fluorinated molecules. For systems in which the fluorine is attached to an sp 2 carbon atom (usually in an aromatic ring) these efforts have produced values for Ā x in the range 142 to 583 ppm/au field with most near 550 ppm/au field. A semiempirical calculation of Ā x at the INDO level suggested a value of 790 ppm/au field . The value from the theoretical work of Augspurger et al . , mentioned earlier (the one used in the calculations of δ E in our work) is 1885 ppm/au field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…For systems in which the fluorine is attached to an sp 2 carbon atom (usually in an aromatic ring) these efforts have produced values for A h x in the range 142 to 583 ppm/au field with most near 550 ppm/au field. [51][52][53][54] A semiempirical calculation of A h x at the INDO level suggested a value of 790 ppm/au field. 55 The value from the theoretical work of Augspurger et al 10,32 mentioned earlier (the one used in the calculations of δ E in our work) is 1885 ppm/au field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will consider this latter assumption first. While the theoretical origins of linear chemical shift -.ir electron electron correlations remain obscure (29), there is ample empirical evidence for quite precise linear relationships in the case of long-range aromatic chemical shifts (14,27,30). The facts that a, and a: are factors for short-range cheniical shifts, and that reasonable p, and p, values are obtained for ortho and n7eta chemical shifts, suggest that these correlations still exist at short range, after non-electronic effects are factored out.…”
Section: Gation It Is Interesting To Note That P For C(l) Increasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a great deal of evidence has accrued from model aromatic systems to suggest that in general the main polar effect is field-induced polarization of the aromatic n electron system (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Various analyses of the magnitude of these effects has been proposed, and the more successful of these (22,23,29) include use of the Buckingham (30) (36) and do not support the view that n-electronic effects on fluorine are responsible for the phenomenon (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%