An investigation into the perception of dominance from schematic faces: A study using the World-Wide Web

Senior, Carl; Phillips, Mary L.; Barnes, Josephine; David, Anthony S.

doi:10.3758/bf03207730

Cited by 69 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Could the weaker effect be due to the fact that the present study was Internet mediated? Senior, Phillips, Barnes, and David (1999), in a WWW study of facial expression and perceived dominance, similarly found an effect weaker than that in the traditional research on which their work was based (see also Krantz & Dalal, 2000). If it is the case that Webmediated studies are in some way less powerful, this is a potential problem for Internet research.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness

Buchanan

2000

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness

Buchanan

2000

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This type of qualitative equivalence (Buchanan, 2007) has been demonstrated for a range of cognitive and perceptual tests, including tests involving very brief, tachistoscopic presentation times (McGraw et al, 2000), measurement of subtle variations in response times (McGraw et al, 2000;Nosek, Banaji & Greenwald, 2002), accurate perception of simple visual stimuli (Krantz et al, 1997;Krantz & Dalal, 2000;McGraw et al, 2000;Senior, Phillips, Barnes & David, 1999), and focused attention (Birnbaum, 2000;Krantz & Dalal, 2000;McGraw et al, 2000). Moreover, a growing number of large-scale Web-based studies of cognition and perception have now been published that have demonstrated reliable, replicable, and theoretically consistent findings (Germine, Duchaine, & Nakayama, 2011;Germine & Hooker, 2011;Nosek et al, 2002;Soto, John, Gosling & Potter, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the increasing sophistication and ubiquity of the Internet, behavioral research is on the cusp of a revolution that will do for population sampling what the computer did for stimulus control and measurement. It remains a common assumption, however, that data from self-selected Web samples must involve a trade-off between participant numbers and data quality. Concerns about data quality are heightened for performance-based cognitive and perceptual measures, particularly those that are timed or that involve complex stimuli. In experiments run with uncompensated, anonymous participants whose motivation for participation is unknown, reduced conscientiousness or lack of focus could produce results that would be difficult to interpret due to decreased overall performance, increased variability of performance, or increased measurement noise. Here, we addressed the question of data quality across a range of cognitive and perceptual tests. For three key performance metrics-mean performance, performance variance, and internal reliability-the results from selfselected Web samples did not differ systematically from those obtained from traditionally recruited and/or lab-tested samples. These findings demonstrate that collecting data from uncompensated, anonymous, unsupervised, self-selected participants need not reduce data quality, even for demanding cognitive and perceptual experiments.

show abstract

“…Finally, dominance smiles serve to maintain and negotiate social or moral status, and are associated with superiority or pride (Senior, Phillips, Barnes, & David, 1999, Tracy & Robins, 2008, defiance (Darwin, 1999(Darwin, /1872, derision, and contempt (Ekman, 2009;Ekman & Friesen, 1986). Unlike reward and affiliative smiles, dominance smiles are assumed to elicit negative feelings in observers (Boksem, Smolders, & De Cremer, 2009;Davidson, Ekman, Saron, Senulis, & Friesen, 1990).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Smiles: Tools for Love, Sympathy, and War

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(up to 150 words)The smile is the most frequent facial expression, but not all smiles are equal. A social functional account holds that smiles of reward, affiliation, and dominance resolve basic social tasks, including rewarding behavior, social bonding, and hierarchy negotiation.Here we explore facial expression patterns associated with the three smiles. We modeled the expressions using a data-driven approach and showed that reward smiles are symmetrical and accompanied by eyebrow raising, affiliative smiles involve lip pressing, and asymmetrical dominance smiles contain nose wrinkling and upper lip raising. A Bayesian classifier analysis and a detection task revealed that the three smile types are highly distinct facial expressions. Finally, social judgments made by a separate participant group showed that the different smile type models convey different social messages. Our results provide the first detailed description of the physical form and social messages conveyed by the three functional smiles, documenting the versatility of these facial expressions.

show abstract

An investigation into the perception of dominance from schematic faces: A study using the World-Wide Web

Cited by 69 publications

References 19 publications

Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness

Internet research: Self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness

Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments

Functional Smiles: Tools for Love, Sympathy, and War

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About