2015
DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2015.993879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the prevalence of cyberbullying among students aged 16–19 in post-compulsory education

Abstract: Young people in society are able to use information and communication technology with ease and exploit the opportunities and benefits of social interaction that has become ingrained in their daily routines. However, as the use of technology has risen, so too has its misuse to harm others. The phenomena of bullying and, more recently, cyberbullying, continue to be of interest to scholars, practitioners and policy makers. To date, the vast majority of research into bullying and cyberbullying has been contained t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, , identified only 8.5% of schools in the United Kingdom had addressed cyberbullying in their school policy. Policies can be effective to encourage appropriate behaviour (Von Marées & Petermann, 2012), so schools should review the guidelines associated with their cyberbullying policies, to avoid disruptive classroom behaviour (Kowalski et al, 2014) and declining academic achievement/attainment associated through cyberbullying (Beale & Hall, 2007;West, 2015). However, while policies are directed at those who bully others, they fail to acknowledge the educational aspect of using digital technologies in a safe and responsible manner (Cassidy et al, 2012).…”
Section: School Commitment and Strategies To Manage Cyberbullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, , identified only 8.5% of schools in the United Kingdom had addressed cyberbullying in their school policy. Policies can be effective to encourage appropriate behaviour (Von Marées & Petermann, 2012), so schools should review the guidelines associated with their cyberbullying policies, to avoid disruptive classroom behaviour (Kowalski et al, 2014) and declining academic achievement/attainment associated through cyberbullying (Beale & Hall, 2007;West, 2015). However, while policies are directed at those who bully others, they fail to acknowledge the educational aspect of using digital technologies in a safe and responsible manner (Cassidy et al, 2012).…”
Section: School Commitment and Strategies To Manage Cyberbullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La mayoría de los estudios intenta explorar la prevalencia tanto para víctimas como para los agresores; sin embargo, este último grupo no se ha podido estimar en todas las poblaciones. En Inglaterra se estimó que la prevalencia del acoso escolar en alumnos de bachillerato es de 7.9% para las víctimas y 1.9% para los agresores (West, 2015). En Latinoamérica destacan los estudios realizados en Brasil, donde se ha podido estimar para alumnos de primaria una prevalencia de 10.2% para víctimas y 7.1% para agresores (Rech, Halpern, Tedesco, y Santos, 2013).…”
Section: Prevalencia Del Acoso Escolarunclassified
“…There is some empirical evidence of such spillover between cyber bullying experiences and the school environment. For example, many young people who experience cyber bullying as a victim report that they are afraid to go to school (Raskauskas and Stoltz 2007 ) and, for some young people, this fear escalates to active avoidance manifested as truancy (West 2015 ; Ybarra et al 2007 ). Involvement in cyber bullying also results in young people feeling less safe in school (Sourander et al 2010 ) and having negative attitudes towards school (Bayar and Ucanok 2012 ; Pyzalski 2012 ).…”
Section: Cyber Bullying and School Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%