1992
DOI: 10.1115/1.2929170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of a Strong Shock-Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction in a Supersonic Compressor Cascade

Abstract: Experiments have been performed in a supersonic cascade facility to elucidate the fluid dynamic phenomena and loss mechanism of a strong shock-wave turbulent boundary layer interaction in a compressor cascade. The cascade geometry is typical for a transonic fan tip section that operates with a relative inlet Mach number of 1.5, a flow turning of about 3 deg, and a static pressure ratio of 2.15. The strong oblique and partly normal blade passage shock-wave with a preshock Mach number level of 1.42 to 1.52 induc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 4 th stage is from the upstream of the second passage shock to the outlet location of the supersonic cascade. According to the experimental results, 9,22 the second passage shock, especially as standing close to the exit of the cascade passage, tilts or presents as lambda shock near the blade surface because of the strong shock/boundary layer interaction (Figure 1). Hence, for most of the previous shock loss models, [5][6][7] modeling of the second passage shock as an entire normal shock may result in an overpredicted shock loss level.…”
Section: ¼ L Np L O ð1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4 th stage is from the upstream of the second passage shock to the outlet location of the supersonic cascade. According to the experimental results, 9,22 the second passage shock, especially as standing close to the exit of the cascade passage, tilts or presents as lambda shock near the blade surface because of the strong shock/boundary layer interaction (Figure 1). Hence, for most of the previous shock loss models, [5][6][7] modeling of the second passage shock as an entire normal shock may result in an overpredicted shock loss level.…”
Section: ¼ L Np L O ð1þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to strong shock interactions with turbulent boundary-layers (e.g. Schreiber and Starken, 1991). The oil flow visualization also illustrates the importance of the experimental setup for the investigation of shock/boundary-layer interactions under turbomachinery conditions.…”
Section: Description Of Interaction Processmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Based on the experimental results, 11 the wedge angle 2 of the upstream branch shock about 8.5 and decelerated from Mach number 1.5 to about 1.19. The wedge angle 2 is calculated by equation (12) in this article 2 % 8:5 ðÀ2Ma 2 2 þ 7M À 5Þ ð 12Þ…”
Section: Shock Loss Of the Terminal Passage Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%