2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02069.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of components of variance and tachyphylaxis in a placebo‐controlled intravenous tyramine study

Abstract: AimsTo explore inter-and intra-volunteer variability for the dose of intravenous tyramine eliciting a 20 mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure from baseline (T YR20) and to evaluate potential tachyphylaxis. MethodsTwelve healthy volunteers received blinded placebo-controlled ascending and descending sequences of intravenous tyramine injections on two separate occasions. The TYR20 was derived by linear interpolation, using three interventions to deal with missing data. ResultsAnalysis of covariance ( ANCOVA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oral Asc tended to increase baseline SkBF at both sites from ϳ30 min after the ingestion, although the potential effect of Asc on baseline SkBF was overlapped on the recovery from tyramine-induced changes in SkBF at site 1. To avoid the confounding effects of remaining vasoconstrictor action and tachyphylaxis due to tyramine administration at the same sites (6), SkBF data at site 2 was used for analyzing the effect of oral Asc on vasoconstrictor response. Changes in forearm CVC as relative values in response to LC in experiment 3 are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral Asc tended to increase baseline SkBF at both sites from ϳ30 min after the ingestion, although the potential effect of Asc on baseline SkBF was overlapped on the recovery from tyramine-induced changes in SkBF at site 1. To avoid the confounding effects of remaining vasoconstrictor action and tachyphylaxis due to tyramine administration at the same sites (6), SkBF data at site 2 was used for analyzing the effect of oral Asc on vasoconstrictor response. Changes in forearm CVC as relative values in response to LC in experiment 3 are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%