12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference 2008
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-5807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Induced Drag Minimization Using a Newton-Krylov Algorithm

Abstract: We present an optimization algorithm for the study of induced drag minimization, with applications to unconventional aircraft design. The algorithm is based on a discrete-adjoint formulation and uses an efficient parallel-Newton-Krylov solution strategy. We validate the optimizer by recovering an elliptical lift distribution using twist optimization; we believe this an important, and under-appreciated, benchmark for aerodynamic optimization. The algorithm is further illustrated using several design examples, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to linear aerodynamic theory, an elliptical spanwise lift distribution produces the minimum induced drag when the wake is planar. This provides a challenging benchmark for optimization algorithms, because an order-perturbation of the elliptical lift distribution produces an order-2 perturbation in the induced drag [36]. Hence, obtaining the elliptical lift distribution requires sufficient accuracy in the drag prediction.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to linear aerodynamic theory, an elliptical spanwise lift distribution produces the minimum induced drag when the wake is planar. This provides a challenging benchmark for optimization algorithms, because an order-perturbation of the elliptical lift distribution produces an order-2 perturbation in the induced drag [36]. Hence, obtaining the elliptical lift distribution requires sufficient accuracy in the drag prediction.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using increments helps improve the robustness of the mesh movement while maintaining linearity; note, however, this approach does have implications for gradient-based optimization, 25,27 since K (i) is a function of b (i−1) . Element stiffness is controlled using a spatially varying Young's modulus.…”
Section: B Control Point Movement Based On Linear Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In order to meet these design requirements, several research groups around the world are developing numerical methods to optimize aircraft that will aid aircraft manufacturers. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The process for aerodynamic shape optimization is shown in Figure 1, and the aim of this work is to develop an efficient and robust flow solver using high-order methods, which will then be used as a platform for aerodynamic shape optimization. Flow solvers have been developed with high-order finite-element, finite-volume and finite-difference schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%