2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of mechanical properties and material removal rate, tool wear rate in EDM machining process of AL2618 alloy reinforced with Si3N4, AlN and ZrB2 composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a complex task to show the impact of all process parameters on the performance criteria. In this work, the primary EDM electrical process parameters such as current, pulse duration/pulse on-time and pulse interval/pulse off-time are chosen based on their significant influence on machining performance characteristics [27,28]. Based on exploratory trial experiments and capacity of the machine setup, the appropriate range for process parameters was selected.…”
Section: Experimental Parameters and Their Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a complex task to show the impact of all process parameters on the performance criteria. In this work, the primary EDM electrical process parameters such as current, pulse duration/pulse on-time and pulse interval/pulse off-time are chosen based on their significant influence on machining performance characteristics [27,28]. Based on exploratory trial experiments and capacity of the machine setup, the appropriate range for process parameters was selected.…”
Section: Experimental Parameters and Their Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al, [5] fabricated aluminum metal matrix composite by sir casting route by reinforcing Aluminum 2618 with AlN (Aluminum Nitride), ZrB 2 (Zirconium Boride) and Si 3 N 4 (Silicon Nitride) particles. It was found that with increase in reinforcement percentages there is considerable increase in mechanical and other properties.…”
Section: P Sreeraj S Thirumalai Kumaran M Uthayakumar S Sureshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For better surface finish, high MRR and less electrode wear, Cu is comparatively better electrode material than Al. Kumar et. al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%