2017
DOI: 10.1177/1098300717696939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Multitiered Behavioral Interventions on Disruptive Behavior and Academic Engagement of Elementary Students

Abstract: School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (SWPBIS) is an empirically based, multifaceted systems approach consisting of school-wide and individual interventions delivered across three levels of support to improve socially valued outcomes (Office of Special Education Programs Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, 2015). Research has shown that schools implementing SWPBIS have fewer office discipline referrals (Vincent, Swain-Bradway, Tobin, & May, 2011) and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that only 16.7% ( n = 2) of the 12 studies published before 2013 met the WWC DS with or without reservations whereas 57.1% ( n = 8) of the 14 studies published after 2013 met the standards with or without reservations. We found that only four studies met the WWC DS without reservation (Bunch‐Crump & Lo, 2017; Hawken & Horner, 2003; Miller et al, 2015; Rodriguez & Anderson, 2014), suggesting that in future studies, researchers should be fully familiarized with WWC standards to ensure that they design high‐quality studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that only 16.7% ( n = 2) of the 12 studies published before 2013 met the WWC DS with or without reservations whereas 57.1% ( n = 8) of the 14 studies published after 2013 met the standards with or without reservations. We found that only four studies met the WWC DS without reservation (Bunch‐Crump & Lo, 2017; Hawken & Horner, 2003; Miller et al, 2015; Rodriguez & Anderson, 2014), suggesting that in future studies, researchers should be fully familiarized with WWC standards to ensure that they design high‐quality studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students self-record their responses by touching the “yes” or “no” that appears on the screen as the self-monitoring prompt fades (The University of Kansas, 2019). Researchers have implemented I-Connect self-monitoring strategies using smartphone-sized tablets (Clemons et al, 2016; Wills & Mason, 2014) and mobile devices (Bunch-Crump & Lo, 2017) with elementary and high-school students with disabilities and disruptive or inattentive behaviors in general education and special education self-contained classrooms. Results of these studies indicated improvements in the behaviors targeted for self-monitoring across participants.…”
Section: Self-monitoring Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… substantial emphasis on academic instruction and students' engagement in academic tasks [24],  whole-class instruction [23],  effective question-answer and individual practices [25],  minimal disruptive behaviour [26].  high teacher expectations [27],  substantial feedback to students [25].…”
Section: Actions Encouraging Problem-solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%