Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Many sedimentary features of gas fields are multilayered, deltaic, thinly laminated shaly sandstones consisting of channel and bar sands with limited lateral and vertical extension. Relying only on conventional openhole log data and performing correlations among nearby wells proved to be inconclusive in identifying gas reservoirs owing to their thin beds, high shale content, and variable formation water resistivity. Missing gas-bearing formations translates into lost productivity, while perforating water zones can have detrimental effects on well performance. Moreover, the limited lateral extent of these relatively tight gas sands leads to extremely depleted reservoirs alternating with layers with virgin zone pressures. As a consequence, the depleted layers face a significant overbalance while drilling with an oil-base mud system. Given these complexities, fluid identification and pressure measurements have a significant impact in resolving key uncertainties of such reservoirs. The main challenges faced during formation testing in the reservoirs studied have been a) laminated, low mobility and thin formations with varying water salinity, b) high depletion, resulting in extreme overbalance for some layers in new wells, c) possible formation damage while drilling, d) cable creep while station logging. Several different approaches have been recently launched to increase the success ratio of wireline formation testers (WFT's) in getting reliable pressures and fluid analysis, including real-time monitoring of each survey by reservoir engineers. This paper describes the development path and results from the new techniques:extra-large diameter probe,elliptical probe,the openhole driller,cable creep correction andextra-extra high displacement pump unit. We will present each project and its impact on the improvement of WFT tester success ratio in such challenging environments. Introduction The predominant sedimentary features in the reservoirs we focus are very thinly laminated shaly sands composed of 70–80% quartz plus feldspar and clays (kaolinite and illite), in which gas sands are not in pressure communication. Figure 1 shows an image log of a 4-meter section where very fine layering is evident. Vertical heterogeneity on various scales lead to multiple gas/water contacts with extremely depleted and virgin zones in the same well, thus resulting in very high over-balance; commonly in excess of 6000 psi and occasionally up to 10000 psi differential pressure. The shale quantity and thin-beds very often results in conventional logs giving wrong fluid determination, therefore fluid analysis using wireline formation testers is a very important step during the open hole evaluation stage. As noted, these conditions are quite challenging for formation testing. Some of these challenges, particularly near wellbore formation alteration have been studied using a multi-probe wireline formation tester (Ayan et al., 2007). In this study, the authors used dipole radial profiling and Interval Pressure Transient Tests (IPTT) and showed that possible formation damage does not necessarily increase with increasing overbalance. Some operational aspects of wireline formation testing have been discussed for such environments (Ferment et al. 2004), highlighting issues with high differentials, probe plugging, fine laminations and depth control. Over the past 20 years, in the formations we focus in this study, the operational success ratio of downhole formation pressure testing (valid test vs. total tests) has remained at an average of 30% despite technological innovations in both wireline and drilling. In Table 1, we summarize the main reasons causing low pretest success ratio. To increase the success ratio for pressure testing and downhole fluid identification, a multitude of solutions were proposed. In this study, we describe each of them and the results achieved following their introduction.
Many sedimentary features of gas fields are multilayered, deltaic, thinly laminated shaly sandstones consisting of channel and bar sands with limited lateral and vertical extension. Relying only on conventional openhole log data and performing correlations among nearby wells proved to be inconclusive in identifying gas reservoirs owing to their thin beds, high shale content, and variable formation water resistivity. Missing gas-bearing formations translates into lost productivity, while perforating water zones can have detrimental effects on well performance. Moreover, the limited lateral extent of these relatively tight gas sands leads to extremely depleted reservoirs alternating with layers with virgin zone pressures. As a consequence, the depleted layers face a significant overbalance while drilling with an oil-base mud system. Given these complexities, fluid identification and pressure measurements have a significant impact in resolving key uncertainties of such reservoirs. The main challenges faced during formation testing in the reservoirs studied have been a) laminated, low mobility and thin formations with varying water salinity, b) high depletion, resulting in extreme overbalance for some layers in new wells, c) possible formation damage while drilling, d) cable creep while station logging. Several different approaches have been recently launched to increase the success ratio of wireline formation testers (WFT's) in getting reliable pressures and fluid analysis, including real-time monitoring of each survey by reservoir engineers. This paper describes the development path and results from the new techniques:extra-large diameter probe,elliptical probe,the openhole driller,cable creep correction andextra-extra high displacement pump unit. We will present each project and its impact on the improvement of WFT tester success ratio in such challenging environments. Introduction The predominant sedimentary features in the reservoirs we focus are very thinly laminated shaly sands composed of 70–80% quartz plus feldspar and clays (kaolinite and illite), in which gas sands are not in pressure communication. Figure 1 shows an image log of a 4-meter section where very fine layering is evident. Vertical heterogeneity on various scales lead to multiple gas/water contacts with extremely depleted and virgin zones in the same well, thus resulting in very high over-balance; commonly in excess of 6000 psi and occasionally up to 10000 psi differential pressure. The shale quantity and thin-beds very often results in conventional logs giving wrong fluid determination, therefore fluid analysis using wireline formation testers is a very important step during the open hole evaluation stage. As noted, these conditions are quite challenging for formation testing. Some of these challenges, particularly near wellbore formation alteration have been studied using a multi-probe wireline formation tester (Ayan et al., 2007). In this study, the authors used dipole radial profiling and Interval Pressure Transient Tests (IPTT) and showed that possible formation damage does not necessarily increase with increasing overbalance. Some operational aspects of wireline formation testing have been discussed for such environments (Ferment et al. 2004), highlighting issues with high differentials, probe plugging, fine laminations and depth control. Over the past 20 years, in the formations we focus in this study, the operational success ratio of downhole formation pressure testing (valid test vs. total tests) has remained at an average of 30% despite technological innovations in both wireline and drilling. In Table 1, we summarize the main reasons causing low pretest success ratio. To increase the success ratio for pressure testing and downhole fluid identification, a multitude of solutions were proposed. In this study, we describe each of them and the results achieved following their introduction.
Deep-water offshore exploration has revealed increasing discovery of unconsolidated and under-compacted reservoirs characterized by high porosity and permeability. Formation evaluation becomes challenging since conventional drilling practices adapted for this environment often results in near-wellbore alteration which can reach deeper into the formation due to relatively low competency of the rock. This characteristic is observed for almost all the deep-water Miocene-Oligocene turbiditic sands across the globe. The concept of near-wellbore damage is a well-known topic, however, its implication in deep-water exploration and production is being studied now in great detail. Measurements of properties like mobility and formation-fluid attributes have been jeopardized by fines migration, damage and alteration. The effect of near wellbore deformation causes development of skin and stiffness change that has a strong impact on formation fluid sampling and pressure acquisition. Multi-pole multi-array sonic acquisition has shown that damage causes variation of sonic-velocity in the radial direction that could be identified and quantified with the current technology. Innovations in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) with greater depth-of-investigation (DOI) and radial-imaging and interpretation techniques indicates that the concept of fines migration causes considerable effect on formation permeability and porosity estimation and has a critical impact on reserve estimation. The current work focuses mainly on two aspects of wellbore alteration on measured logs. First, effect of alteration has been identified by using multi-DOI NMR and sonic measurements in an integrated manner. Secondly, and subsequently, quantification of the damage was measured along with its impact on other measurements like formation-tester. This integrated technique can significantly and efficiently reduce formation sampling duration by locating damaged-zones and effectively reduces acquisition cost in a complex deepwater operation. The implication of identifying the damaged zone has a great value in designing optimum completion and sand management and exclusion technique at the subsequent stages of development.
Enhanced oil recovery methods, i.e. acid stimulation, are widely used to increase well productivity in oilfield development. The necessity for reservoir stimulation is linked with negative processes related to well drilling and perforation. The correct estimation of damaged zone parameters is the key problem for acid stimulation planning. The proposed petrophysical methodology is based on available data integration: core data, drilling data, well logging, well testing etc. Modern well logging suite allows to solve following task with high accuracy. Sonic radial profiling based on compressional and shear waves registration and multisonde resistivity logging are the key methods to prognose wellbore damaged zone radius and parameters. The methodology based on integration of both these logging data is proposed in this paper. Currently, fullwave acoustic logging provides comprehensive data to estimate drilling mud penetration zone and character of the damage. The approach is based on alteration of sonic waves – compressional and shear waves. But not all the wells logged with sophisticated modern acoustic log tools. Therefore, estimation of mud filtrate penetration and damaged zone is possible based on multiarray resistivity measurements which are primary methods in all well logging suites. At least three different sondes with different radius of investigation are run in a well. These data are enough to use for accurate damaged wellbore zone radius estimation. Calculated results were supported by other available information and verified by data from modern sonic tools. Thus, allows to improve the methodology and use it widely in all wells in a field. Modern fullwave acoustic logging was performed by Schlumberger in few wells of carbonate field of the Company. In rest of the wells wellbore damaged zone estimation based on proposed integrated approach applied for multiarray resistivity interpretation. This workflow allowed to optimize acid near wellbore zone stimulation for the oil recovery enhancement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.