2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of quantitative methods for assessing intersectionality in health research: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is likely there is underrepresentation of certain groups not apparent in this review (e.g., transgender Black men). Thus, we again refer readers to recent scholarship on quantitative intersectional methods (Bauer et al, 2021; Burke et al, 2020; Guan et al, 2021). Fourth, we did not include weight status as a variable in this review; however, given very few studies included individuals with higher‐weight AN and many BED trials included weight loss components or outcomes, it seems evaluating weight status reporting and representation is an important future direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is likely there is underrepresentation of certain groups not apparent in this review (e.g., transgender Black men). Thus, we again refer readers to recent scholarship on quantitative intersectional methods (Bauer et al, 2021; Burke et al, 2020; Guan et al, 2021). Fourth, we did not include weight status as a variable in this review; however, given very few studies included individuals with higher‐weight AN and many BED trials included weight loss components or outcomes, it seems evaluating weight status reporting and representation is an important future direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, any within‐ or between‐group analyses should be planned thoughtfully and the literature consulted during the design phase. Finally, to assess intersectionality, we refer readers to recent publications by scholars in the field (Bauer et al, 2021; Burke et al, 2020; Guan et al, 2021); in particular, Guan et al (2021) provide an overview of various analytic methods to assess intersectionality, including strengths, limitations, and uses, which should be incorporated into a priori power planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…health professionals report preferring day shifts (Stimpfel et al, 2019) and are less likely to work overtime (Anxo & Karlsson, 2019). Quantitative investigations of intersectional identities are under-explored and not uniformly approached (Guan et al, 2021). Nevertheless, intersectionality has been linked with economic insecurity and perceived job insecurity where individuals with multiple marginalized identities experience hierarchies of disadvantage (Lavaysse et al, 2018;Maroto et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In path analysis and structural equation modeling [87], the influence of the moderating variable is assessed on a hypothesized mediated relationship between the main exposure and a health outcome of interest (potentially important mediating intersection). The test evaluates whether the indirect effect of a mediation analysis is modified by different levels of another variable.…”
Section: Structural Analyses and Variance Decomposition Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%