2008
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of Sex Differences in Word Ratings Across Concrete, Abstract, and Emotion Words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The post-hoc analyses showed no obvious difference in the effects of emotional variables on word recognition across genders and no interaction of gender with emotional variables (in line with Bauer & Altarriba, 2008). Rather, the pattern of results mirrors the ones found in the original analyses, lending further support to our crucial interaction between valence and arousal dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The post-hoc analyses showed no obvious difference in the effects of emotional variables on word recognition across genders and no interaction of gender with emotional variables (in line with Bauer & Altarriba, 2008). Rather, the pattern of results mirrors the ones found in the original analyses, lending further support to our crucial interaction between valence and arousal dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Other studies report no gender differences in the ratings for affective content of written words (Bauer & Altarriba, 2008). To date, no study has investigated the effect of gender on written emotion word processing.…”
Section: Post-hoc Analyses Of Gender Differences In Emotion Processingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are published norms for pictures (Dan-Glauser & Scherer, in press;Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1999;Moltó et al, 1999) and sounds (Bradley & Lang, 1999a;Fernández-Abascal et al, 2008;Redondo, Fraga, Padrón, & Piñeiro, 2008). Concerning words, the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW), developed by Bradley and Lang (1999b), is the most extensive affective database and the most widely used in studies about the emotional properties of words conducted in English, although other databases also exist (e.g., Altarriba, Bauer, & Benvenuto, 1999;Bauer & Altarriba, 2008). The ANEW has been adapted to other languages, such as Spanish (Redondo, Fraga, Padrón, & Comesaña, 2007) and Portuguese (Soares, Comesaña, Pinheiro, Simões, & Frade, in press).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the studies show that the females are dominant in abstract thinking (Sciencedaily, 2008) whereas other studies suggest that there is not gender-based difference in terms of abstract thinking and use of abstract concepts or there is male-dominant abstract language use (Altarriba 2008;Roberts, 2010;Corpus callosum, 2011). …”
Section: Aim Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%