1984
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2999(84)90414-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the actions of the calcium entry facilitator bay K 864 on the rat vas deferens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1985
1985
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Verapamil was reported to increase the NE release in the rat vas deferens at concen trations around 10-5 M, probably by blocking the presynaptic a2-receptors (9). Bay k 8644 at 10-6-10-5 M, higher than that of the present study, was also shown to increase the NE release in the rat vas deferens (8,10); how ever, the increment was considered to be due to the activation of presynaptic calcium channels by Bay k 8644. Therefore, it is plausible to suppose in the present study that nifedipine and Bay k 8644 selectively affect the voltage-dependent calcium channels in the circular smooth muscle; on the other hand, verapamil may exert nonspecific actions in addition to blocking the calcium channels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Verapamil was reported to increase the NE release in the rat vas deferens at concen trations around 10-5 M, probably by blocking the presynaptic a2-receptors (9). Bay k 8644 at 10-6-10-5 M, higher than that of the present study, was also shown to increase the NE release in the rat vas deferens (8,10); how ever, the increment was considered to be due to the activation of presynaptic calcium channels by Bay k 8644. Therefore, it is plausible to suppose in the present study that nifedipine and Bay k 8644 selectively affect the voltage-dependent calcium channels in the circular smooth muscle; on the other hand, verapamil may exert nonspecific actions in addition to blocking the calcium channels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…In the present study, three calcium-entry modulators were used at concentrations be tween 10-8 M and 3x10-5 M. It has been reported that nifedipine at 10-5 or 5 X 10-4 M did not affect the nerve-stimulated release of [3H]-NE in the guinea pig and rat vas deferens (7,8). Verapamil was reported to increase the NE release in the rat vas deferens at concen trations around 10-5 M, probably by blocking the presynaptic a2-receptors (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…the electrically stimulated 3H overflow was not enhanced by Bay K 8644 (10-7-3x10-5 M). This result is in agreement with the finding by Hyland et al (10) using the isolated rat vas deferens. Therefore, it may be assumed that there are differences in the number or properties of Ca2+ channels in the adrenergic nerve endings that are activated by the two modes of stimulation.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Both the maximum direct contraction to amidephrine and the maximum potentiation of the contraction to a single stimulus pulse were significantly reduced in prostatic portions of the vas deferens of SHR. These actions ofamidephrine are al-adrenoceptor mediated since: (a) other al-agonists have similar actions (cirazoline, Docherty & McGrath, 1982;phenylephrine, MacDonald & McGrath, 1980), whereas x2-selective agonists, such as xylazine, do not normally have these actions (Hyland et al, 1984); (b) prazosin antagonizes the potentiation in a competitive manner (Docherty & McGrath, 1982); (c) Pbz antagonizes the potentiation in a noncompetitive manner; (d) rauwolscine did not antagonize the potentiation in concentrations that produce a2-adrenoceptor blockade (Docherty, 1984a and present results). The potentiation of stimulation-evoked contractions by ax,-adrenoceptor agonists is postjunctionally mediated since: (a) potentiation occurs in the concentration range in which these agonists produce intermittent direct contractions of the smooth muscle (MacDonald & McGrath, 1980;and present (Yamada et al, 1980;Woodcock & Johnson, 1980), although not in SHR (Hicks et al, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%