2018
DOI: 10.2399/yod.18.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the factors causing inequality of opportunity in education in Turkey through rank order judgement from the perspective of academicians

Abstract: E E ¤itimde f›rsat eflitli¤i; genel olarak cinsiyet, dil, din, ›rk, ekonomik düzey vb. özellikler aç›s›ndan ayr›m yap›l-maks›z›n toplumun bütün bireylerine kendi yeteneklerini ortaya koymalar› için gerekli olanaklar›n sunulmas› fleklinde tan›mlanmaktad›r (Canöz, 2014). Bu anlamda e¤itime eriflim ve e¤itim hizmetlerinden yararlanma konusunda toplumdaki fark-l› bireyler için dezavantaj oluflturabilecek uygulamalar›n e¤itimde f›rsat eflitsizli¤ine neden oldu¤u ifade edilmektedir. Dolay›

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Önder and Güçlü (2014), based on the findings of their studies, stated that public resource distribution, teacher education, teacher change rate, family education, early childhood education, school-family cooperation, exam pressure on the education system, He suggested that arrangements should be made in the fields of training leaders, evaluation and establishment of a follow-up system. It was determined by Gezer and İlhan (2018) that the socio-economic level of academics is the most important variable that causes inequality in education in Turkey. This in order; settlement (rural-urban), parental characteristics, disability, geographical region, mother tongue, gender, number of children in the family, technological opportunities, religion and belief, and ethnicity in the last place.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Önder and Güçlü (2014), based on the findings of their studies, stated that public resource distribution, teacher education, teacher change rate, family education, early childhood education, school-family cooperation, exam pressure on the education system, He suggested that arrangements should be made in the fields of training leaders, evaluation and establishment of a follow-up system. It was determined by Gezer and İlhan (2018) that the socio-economic level of academics is the most important variable that causes inequality in education in Turkey. This in order; settlement (rural-urban), parental characteristics, disability, geographical region, mother tongue, gender, number of children in the family, technological opportunities, religion and belief, and ethnicity in the last place.…”
Section: Results Discussion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we reviewed the literature, we realized that the analyses were carried out in Microsoft Excel on the grounds the traditional method in studies in which the scaling with ranking judgments was utilized (e.g., Bal, 2011;Bozgeyikli and Kesici, 2016;Bozgeyikli and Toprak, 2013;Demirçelik et al, 2021;Gezer and İlhan, 2018;Örs Özdil and Kınay, 2015;Özdemir, 2021;Şahin et al, 2015;Şahin, Sarkın and Taşdemir, 2019;Toprak et al 2020;Yalçın and Şengül-Avşar, 2014;Yıldırım, Seheryeli and Anıl, 2020). A multi-step process is followed while the data collected by means of the ranking judgments are analyzed according to traditional method in Microsoft Excel.…”
Section: Analysis Of Data Collected By Ranking Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research findings posited that socio-economic variables are key indicators for educational opportunities and inequality in Turkey (Gezer & İlhan, 2018). Besides the other variables determined in order of importance are residence: rural (i.e., villages, towns, and small settlements) or urban (i.e., metropolis), parental characteristics, disability, geographical region, mother tongue, gender, number of children in a household, technological facilities, religion and beliefs, and lastly ethnic origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%