1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02208284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the features of loading in thermal fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to non-isotherm al conditions, under low -cycle loading and isotherm al conditions, the fracture m ode is independent o f the cycle stress ratio and is defined by the values o f the cycle stress am plitude and m ean stress. The noted difference in the grouping o f the points is due to the peculiarities o f the deform ation and fracture o f m aterials under non-isotherm al conditions indicated above and in [ 1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to non-isotherm al conditions, under low -cycle loading and isotherm al conditions, the fracture m ode is independent o f the cycle stress ratio and is defined by the values o f the cycle stress am plitude and m ean stress. The noted difference in the grouping o f the points is due to the peculiarities o f the deform ation and fracture o f m aterials under non-isotherm al conditions indicated above and in [ 1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…V r c r ( 1) and in the case o f fatigue fracture [ 12] (2) Prediction o f a possible lim it state can also be m ade using the values o f the steady-state creep rate. I f the steady-state creep rate exceeds the threshold value, one should expect a quasi-static fracture (a change in the shape).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). 3. Determine coefficients C and n from the above diagrams for the preset temperatures (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such criteria for complex low-cycle nonisothermal loading, especially with phase shift between low-cycle mechanical loading (ML) and cyclic heating (CH), have not yet been developed. Application of criteria developed for isothermal loading conditions to the nonisothermal loading provides incorrect results, due to sufficient differences between deformation and fracture processes in materials under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions [2,3]. Available approaches to fatigue crack propagation rate (FCPR) assessment for thermomechanical loading (TML) based on summation of cyclic loading and loading time inputs [4] are quite cumbersome and sophisticated for engineering practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%