1997
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0289.00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investigation of the Female–Male Wage Gap During the Industrial Revolution in Britain

Abstract: I t is well known that, during the industrial revolution, the gap between men's and women's wages was large. The female-male wage ratio generally varied from one-third to two-thirds, depending on the type of work and the location (see table 1). Neoclassical economic theory assumes that wages equal the marginal product of labour, and would interpret this wage gap as evidence of productivity differences. 2 However, because the wage gap is so large, many historians find the neoclassical assumption inadequate. Hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
22
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1 He also measured the degree to which women's wages were lower than those for men, and came to the conclusion that the female dummy before 1560 was much lower than after 1560, which points in the same direction (but unfortunately he did not test this in more detail). Similar evidence for the late 18th and early 19th century has been published by Joyce Burnette (1997Burnette ( , 2008. The agricultural wage data in particular point to a further decline of relative wages of women: between 1760 and 1800 she estimated a wage ratio of about .48, declining to .42 between 1800 and 1840.…”
Section: Relative Wages Of Women 1500-1800supporting
confidence: 69%
“…1 He also measured the degree to which women's wages were lower than those for men, and came to the conclusion that the female dummy before 1560 was much lower than after 1560, which points in the same direction (but unfortunately he did not test this in more detail). Similar evidence for the late 18th and early 19th century has been published by Joyce Burnette (1997Burnette ( , 2008. The agricultural wage data in particular point to a further decline of relative wages of women: between 1760 and 1800 she estimated a wage ratio of about .48, declining to .42 between 1800 and 1840.…”
Section: Relative Wages Of Women 1500-1800supporting
confidence: 69%
“…After all, domestic servants received payment in kind in the form of food and shelter (Theresa McBride 1974;Joyce Burnette 1997). I have therefore added the annual price of a one man's bare-bones consumer basket to their annual wage (Table 5).…”
Section: Real Wagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kussmaul, Servants , pp. 143–4; Bardsley, ‘Women's work reconsidered’, p. 29; Burnette, ‘Investigation’, pp. 258–9; Burnette, ‘Wages and employment’, p. 672; Ogilvie, Bitter living , pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berg, ‘What difference’, p. 31; Sharpe, Adapting to capitalism , pp. 139–40; Simonton, History of European women's work , p. 45; Burnette, ‘Investigation’, p. 258. Of course, changes over time occurred, but the inequality was not resolved by industrialization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation