2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the inelastic behaviour of trabecular bone during the press-fit implantation of a tibial component in total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinct differences in compaction patterns were observed between tip designs, with flat tips generating a growing region of compacted material (referred to here as a bolus) directly below the tip, and sharp tips instead compacting material only along the sides of the indenter. Concentration of compacted material along the side of the indenter was consistent with the findings of similar push‐in studies in polyurethane foam . Large differences in density between human bone specimens, as well the extreme geometrical differences between tip designs, also provided a rigorous challenge for validation of the accuracy of the simulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Distinct differences in compaction patterns were observed between tip designs, with flat tips generating a growing region of compacted material (referred to here as a bolus) directly below the tip, and sharp tips instead compacting material only along the sides of the indenter. Concentration of compacted material along the side of the indenter was consistent with the findings of similar push‐in studies in polyurethane foam . Large differences in density between human bone specimens, as well the extreme geometrical differences between tip designs, also provided a rigorous challenge for validation of the accuracy of the simulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In combination with current bone plasticity formulations (Kelly et al, 2013;Kinzl et al, 2013), the results of the present study will help to improve numerical press-fit models with porous surfaces by a better estimation of the applied interference (due to numerically including the abrasion) and accounting for the nonconstant friction coefficient during implantation. This could improve the estimation of primary implant stability derived from finite element models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Models using idealised material properties may capture gross differences, but are unlikely to capture subtle variations and localised effects. Bone is routinely assumed to be isotropic and linear elastic, except for some instances which have implemented anisotropy (Taylor et al, 2002;Hazrati Marangalou et al, 2013) and post-yield behaviour (Taylor et al, 1995;Kelly et al, 2013;Janssen et al, 2010;. These assumptions of linear and isotropic material behaviour are, in part, due to the limited information that can be extracted from clinical grade CT scans.…”
Section: Development Of a Representative Model With Appropriate Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone ingrowth/ ongrowth will occur if the micromotions are less than 40-50 μm and fibrous tissue formation will occur if the micromotions are in excess of 150 μm (Pilliar et al, 1986). FE has been extensively to analysis the primary stability of femoral stems (Tensi et al, 1989;Rohlmann et al, 1988; (Udofia et al, 2007;Spears et al, 2001;Janssen et al, 2010;Ries et al, 1997;Spears et al, 1999Spears et al, , 2000Ong et al, 2006;Bellini et al, 2007;Amirouche et al, 2008;Hothi et al, 2011Hothi et al, , 2012 and the tibial component of knee replacement Chong et al, 2010;Kelly et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 1998) since Rohlmann et al, 1988 first explored primary stability. A number of assumptions have become accepted and routinely implemented.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Initial Mechanical Environment Of The Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation