An Investigation of the Influence of the Night Lighting in a Urban Park on Individuals’ Emotions

Abstract

Outdoor urban lighting design is a complex issue. It involves multiple aspects (energy consumption, lighting pollution, aesthetics, and safety) that must be balanced to make sustainable decisions. Although the energy and environmental issues assumed a driving role in the optimization of the urban lighting design, its impact on the psychophysical well-being of individuals has received less attention. Artificial lighting has been shown to add several meanings to an individual’s experience of space: affective (affect, emotion, mood), cognitive (attention, imagination, perception), associative (memory, judgment), and motivational (closeness, openness, communication). Traditionally, studies on the effects of lighting on individuals’ emotions have mainly focused on indoor spaces, while the present study aims to investigate the influence of lighting on individuals’ emotions in an outdoor environment. Participants experienced a simulated urban park through virtual reality. Specifically, the urban park was shown with different combinations of overall illuminance (high vs medium vs low) and correlated colour temperature (CCT) (warm vs intermediate vs cool). For each combination, participants were asked to judge how they felt. In general, results showed that high-intensity cool light made participants more nervous, while warm light made individuals feel more tired and less motivated to explore the park. In contrast, an intermediate CCT at low or medium illuminance impacted individuals positively. Finally, it was found that participants’ mood predicted the impact that park lighting would have on them. These results suggest that assessing the influence of lighting on individuals’ emotions allows the decision-makers to implement the type of artificial lighting that will simultaneously safeguard both the well-being of individuals and the environment.

Exploring the restorative benefits of work in smart working structures on vacations in small villages

“…This means that less frequent negative events (e.g., cars or motos pass-by and sirens) combined with natural or anthropic sounds may induce a positive emotional state in the individuals without draining attentive sources. In terms of the effect of visual stimuli, while those related to the brightness of the surroundings (Hvass et al, 2021;Masullo et al, 2022) and possible glare effects due to the sun (Rodriguez et al, 2016) have been mis-considered in this experiment, those related to the quality of the vision were found not to influence the working performances (e.g., distract them significantly from work). Considering the combination of the visual and auditory stimuli, De Korte et al evaluated that the subjects who work in an open office environment were exposed to different types of visual or auditory distractions (walking past the visual field of the subject and telephone conversations within hearing distance).…”

Air pollution perception for air quality management: a systematic review exploring research themes and future perspectives

“…Preference studies were one of the first methods to be used for understanding air quality perception, which started in 1980 (Malm et al 1980). Preference studies are qualitative, and they usually ask the participants to rank a particular vista/ scenery or a picture of a scenery or an environment (Malm et al 1980, Fajardo et al 2013, Masullo et al 2022. The country-wise details of these studies and their methodology are listed in table 1.…”

Effects of indoor lighting environments on paper reading efficiency and brain fatigue: an experimental study

“…Light sources with a low color temperature have a higher proportion of red radiation in their energy distribution, known as "warm light". As the color temperature increases, the proportion of blue radiation also increases, known as "cool light" (Masullo et al, 2022). Changes in color temperature can affect how people feel, such as comfort, pleasure, seriousness, or coldness.…”

“…To eliminate the impact of variations in human thermal comfort during the experiment, the laboratory environment was controlled at a temperature range of 23 °C-25 °C (Celsius) and a relative humidity between 30% and 70%, ensuring that the participants were within a comfortable range (Masullo et al, 2022).…”