2015
DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2015/20130391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the nature of a Pc5 pulsation event using SuperDARN and magnetometer data

Abstract: Pc5 pulsations are global magnetohydrodynamic events in the magnetosphere. We employed an Automated Pulsation Finder program to identify significant Pc5 pulsation events in SuperDARN radar data. The event presented here was visible in the Goose Bay, Saskatoon and Þykkvibaer high-frequency radars, located in the northern polar region. These observations were coordinated with magnetometers within their field of view. These two instrument types – radars and magnetometers – complement each other. These observation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to ionospheric screening, the attenuation factor has to be small in order for the waves to be detected on the ground by magnetometers. Whilst ULF waves with a high m number have been simultaneously detected in the ionosphere by radar and in ground magnetometer data (e.g., Yeoman et al., 2012; Mtumela et al., 2015), such multi‐instrument observations of intermediate‐ m and high‐ m waves are sparse. The same particle energy predicted for the 0.8 mHz wave observed by the radar is applicable for the magnetometer data, clearly indicating that the same wave activity was observed simultaneously in the radar and magnetometer data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to ionospheric screening, the attenuation factor has to be small in order for the waves to be detected on the ground by magnetometers. Whilst ULF waves with a high m number have been simultaneously detected in the ionosphere by radar and in ground magnetometer data (e.g., Yeoman et al., 2012; Mtumela et al., 2015), such multi‐instrument observations of intermediate‐ m and high‐ m waves are sparse. The same particle energy predicted for the 0.8 mHz wave observed by the radar is applicable for the magnetometer data, clearly indicating that the same wave activity was observed simultaneously in the radar and magnetometer data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mtumela et al. (2015) note that ground magnetometers and HF radars are synergistic instrument types for studying ULF waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, (hereafter Paper 1; Mtumela et al, 2015) have reported a detailed case study of a magnetospheric field line resonance with a frequency in the Pc5 range using radars from SuperDARN (Super Dual Auroral Radar Network; Greenwald et al, 1995;Chisham et al, 2007) and the CARISMA (Canadian Array for Realtime Investigations of Magnetic Activity; Mann et al, 2008), Greenland (DTU Space, 2015), and IMAGE (International Monitor for Auroral Geomagnetic Effects; Tanskanen, 2009) magnetometer arrays. The global coverage of this event was substantially greater than in previous such studies (Fenrich et al, 1995;Ziesolleck et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%