1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01321367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the normative and factor analytic composition of six questionnaires used for subject selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though all subjects also meet a Fear Survey Schedule cutoff score, the use of this measure is probably unnecessary. Less than 5O7o of the female subjects tested by Kaloupek et al (1981b) had a score of less than 5 on Fear Survey item No. 39 if their SNAQ factor score was 6 or greater.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though all subjects also meet a Fear Survey Schedule cutoff score, the use of this measure is probably unnecessary. Less than 5O7o of the female subjects tested by Kaloupek et al (1981b) had a score of less than 5 on Fear Survey item No. 39 if their SNAQ factor score was 6 or greater.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, factor scores were calculated by adding the number of affirmative responses to sets of items identified through principal components analysis by Kaloupek et al (1981b). Four factor scores were created in this manner: General Snake Fear, Snake Representations, Positive Snake Attributes, and Avoidance of Snakes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examination of the tabled values suggests that the subjects reported fairly high speech anxiety and moderate general fearfulness (cf. Kaloupek, Peterson, & Levis, 1981). The level of public speaking anxiety reported on the PRCS also was compared with the values reported by Paul (1966) for a sample of presumed speech phobies, with the result indicating a significantly higher value for the present sample ( t = 3.11, p < .01).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%