An investigation of the relationships between suicidal ideation, psychache, and meaning in life using network analysis

Abstract

Background Previous studies have investigated the relationships between psychache or meaning in life and suicidal ideation based on sum score of corresponding scale. However, this practice has hampered the fine-grained understanding of their relationships. This network analysis study aimed to conduct a dimension-level analysis of these constructs and the relationships among them in a joint framework, and identify potential intervention targets to address suicidal ideation. Methods Suicidal ideation, psychache, and meaning in life were measured using self-rating scales among 738 adults. A network of suicidal ideation, psychache, and meaning in life was constructed to investigate the connections between dimensions and calculate the expected influence and bridge expected influence of each node. Results “Psychache” was positively linked to “sleep” and “despair”, while “presence of meaning in life” had negative associations with “psychache”, “despair”, and “pessimism”. The most important central nodes were “sleep” and “despair”, and the critical bridge nodes were “presence of meaning in life” and “psychache”. Conclusion These preliminary findings uncover the pathological pathways underlying the relationships between psychache, meaning in life, and suicidal ideation. The central nodes and bridge nodes identified may be potential targets for effectively preventing and intervening against the development and maintenance of suicidal ideation.

The association between team cohesion and performance: A network analysis of nurses

“…Unlike the latent variable model, which views latent variables as the co‐dominant factors of the observed variables, the network analysis model takes the observed variables as the main indicators (Borsboom, 2008). It can visualize active interrelationships within variables as a network consisting of nodes (dimensions) and edges (correlations between dimensions), thus overcoming the shortcomings of traditional methods that passively treat dimensions as latent variables (Galderisi et al, 2018; Li et al, 2023). In addition, network analysis can provide centrality and predictability indices to assess the relative importance and controllability of each node in the network (Contreras et al, 2019; Haslbeck & Fried, 2017).…”

Relationship between quality of life, fear of disease progression, and coping styles in patients with pulmonary hypertension: A network analysis

“…Network analysis is an emerging statistical method that allows the analysis of relationships between dimensions and does not rely on theoretical models assuming dependent variables. It is based on a network theoretical perspective to reflect the active interactions of dimensions of variables and can overcome the shortcomings of traditional methods that passively treat dimensions as latent variables (Li et al, 2023). This allows for investigating intricate and real-world correlations among multidimensional components.…”