1994
DOI: 10.1080/758523954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the robustness of the day-of-the-week effect in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data employed in the study are closing prices from the Australian Stock Exchange ( The specification follows evidence by Jaffe and Westerfield (1985), Finn et al (1991), Easton and Faff (1994), Agrawal and Tandon (1994) and Davidson and Faff (1999) Two approaches are used to test these hypotheses. The first involves a descriptive analysis of the mean returns and tests of equality of means using parametric analysis.…”
Section: Research Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data employed in the study are closing prices from the Australian Stock Exchange ( The specification follows evidence by Jaffe and Westerfield (1985), Finn et al (1991), Easton and Faff (1994), Agrawal and Tandon (1994) and Davidson and Faff (1999) Two approaches are used to test these hypotheses. The first involves a descriptive analysis of the mean returns and tests of equality of means using parametric analysis.…”
Section: Research Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Monday effect is not consistent in all contexts. For instance, Jaffe and Westerfield, Finn et al (1991), Easton and Faff (1994), Agrawal and Tandon (1994) and Davidson and Faff (1999) find a significantly negative Tuesday effect in Australian stock returns, and Jaffe and Westerfield propose a linkage between Tuesdays in the Asia-Pacific and the (negative) Monday effect in the US.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, the use of OLS has been argued to be unsuitable in the presence of serial correlation. Despite these criticisms, there are studies that show that the conclusions drawn from robust estimation and OLS techniques are similar (see Easton and Faff, 1994;Alexakis and Xanthakis, 1995;Kamath et al, 1998).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%