1989
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(89)90089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the spin structure of the proton in deep inelastic scattering of polarised muons on polarised protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
145
2
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,025 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
145
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, there exist many unresolved questions for the structure of the nucleon. The EMC experiments [1] and subsequent experiments show that quark spin carries only ∼ 30% of the total spin of the nucleon. Consequently, one concludes that the remaining ∼ 70% should be carried by the quark orbital contribution and the glue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, there exist many unresolved questions for the structure of the nucleon. The EMC experiments [1] and subsequent experiments show that quark spin carries only ∼ 30% of the total spin of the nucleon. Consequently, one concludes that the remaining ∼ 70% should be carried by the quark orbital contribution and the glue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before 1990, it was assumed that the angular momentum of the proton came from the spin of the three valence quarks and that the sea was totally symmetric. As discussed in Section 1.1, measurements of spin structure functions [13] indicated that relatively little angular momentum came from the valence quarks, and the search was on for the other contributions. Sea quarks were high on the list.…”
Section: Strange Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of the "spin crisis" in 1989 [12,13], in which data on the spin-structure functions of the proton indicated that the spin of the proton was not simply the sum of the spins of the valence quarks, raised the question of the role of strange quarks in the nucleon [14]. McKeown [15] explained that PVES was a practical way to measure the strangeness content of nucleon elastic form factors.…”
Section: History Of the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the SLAC measurements were in line with expectations from the QPM, the EMC results showed in the previously unmeasured small-x region (x < 0.1) a clear disagreement with potentially dramatic consequences. 33,34 In the QPM, the nucleon spin is supposed to arise entirely from the quark spins, while in relativistic quark models a contribution of about 60% is expected. However, the EMC result was compatible with zero.…”
Section: Nucleon Spin and Polarised Deep Inelastic Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%