2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11043-014-9251-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation on the field strength and loading rate dependences of the hysteretic dynamics of magnetorheological dampers

Abstract: This paper is an extended study on the model of the hysteretic dynamics of magnetorheological dampers based on a phenomenological phase transition theory (Wang and Kamath in Smart Mater. Struct. 15(6): [1725][1726][1727][1728][1729][1730][1731][1732][1733] 2006). It is demonstrated that, by appropriately choosing model parameters, the frequency dependence of the hysteretic dynamics can be captured very well by the model based on phase transition theory. Whilst by introducing an appropriate rescaling coefficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is able to characterize the dynamic hysteresis characteristic of the MR damper, and the comparison between the experiment and simulation results in Figure 2 illustrates it well. Zhang et al 23 extended the model, making it to be capable of modeling the loading rate and field strength dependencies, and the model can be expressed as follows: ρktruef¨+μktruef˙+αkf+β(kf)3+γ(kf)5=pk=k1+k2eprefix−k3I2, where f is the damping force, p is the driving velocity, ρ, μ, α, β, and γ are material‐specific constants (when α is equal to 0 and other parameters are not equal to 0, the model is reduced to an ordinary linear damper), k is the rescaling coefficient introduced by the model to describe the field dependence, I is the control current intensity, and k1, k2, and k3 are material‐specific constants.…”
Section: System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model is able to characterize the dynamic hysteresis characteristic of the MR damper, and the comparison between the experiment and simulation results in Figure 2 illustrates it well. Zhang et al 23 extended the model, making it to be capable of modeling the loading rate and field strength dependencies, and the model can be expressed as follows: ρktruef¨+μktruef˙+αkf+β(kf)3+γ(kf)5=pk=k1+k2eprefix−k3I2, where f is the damping force, p is the driving velocity, ρ, μ, α, β, and γ are material‐specific constants (when α is equal to 0 and other parameters are not equal to 0, the model is reduced to an ordinary linear damper), k is the rescaling coefficient introduced by the model to describe the field dependence, I is the control current intensity, and k1, k2, and k3 are material‐specific constants.…”
Section: System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the parameters of the MR fluid used in the current paper, which are chosen as the same as those in Reference 23. These parameters are obtained by applying the model to experimental data, 25 where the experiments were conducted on an MR damper model RD‐1005‐3 manufactured by Lord Corporation, and the viscous and shear properties of the MR fluid are controlled by the applied magnetic field, which is a function of the excitation current.…”
Section: System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MR damper force is characterised by significant hysteresis [9][10] and delay, in the range of tens of milliseconds, owing to the inductance of the MR damper electromagnetic circuit [11][12]. Damping characteristics can be continuously adapted by controlling the electrical current that passes through the electromagnet [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos numéricos e aplicações a escala real sobre esse tipo de dispositivo são encontrados em: Spencer et al (1997); Dyke et al (1996), Jansen e Dyke (2000), Xu et al (2000), Gavin et al (2001), Yi et al (2001), Ramallo et al (2002), , Johnson et al (2003), Sodeyama et al (2003), Sahasrabudhe e Nagarajaiah (2006), Nagarajaiah et al (2006a), Tsang et al (2006, Chooi e Oyadiji (2008), Carneiro (2009), Çesmeci e Engin (2010), Lara (2011), Basili et al (2013), Cha et al (2013), Jiang et al (2013), Zhang et al (2015) e Cha e Bai (2016).…”
Section: Amortecedores Fluídos Controláveismentioning
confidence: 99%