2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation to study the combined effect of different infill pattern and infill density on the impact strength of 3D printed polylactic acid parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the percentage of 10 to 20% is the optimum infill for maximizing the stiffness-to-mass, but it is recommended to use a higher infill to avoid the drop off in flexural rigidity. Mishra et al [ 20 ] researched the effect of different combinations of infill densities and infill patterns on the absorbed energy of the PLA 3D-printed samples. The results concluded that an 85% infill density for each infill pattern demonstrated the highest energy absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the percentage of 10 to 20% is the optimum infill for maximizing the stiffness-to-mass, but it is recommended to use a higher infill to avoid the drop off in flexural rigidity. Mishra et al [ 20 ] researched the effect of different combinations of infill densities and infill patterns on the absorbed energy of the PLA 3D-printed samples. The results concluded that an 85% infill density for each infill pattern demonstrated the highest energy absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the earlier stage of FDM, the printing potential was limited by a small selection of thermoplastic filament materials [ 61 ]. Fortunately, with an increasing variety of filament materials offering a wide range of physical, mechanical, and electronic properties, FDM is now highly compatible with a wider range of materials, including acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) [ 62 , 63 , 64 ], polycaprolactone (PCL) [ 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 ], polylactic acid (PLA) [ 69 , 70 , 71 ], nylon [ 72 , 73 , 74 ], polypropylene (PP) [ 75 , 76 , 77 ], thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) [ 78 , 79 ], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [ 80 , 81 ], high impact polystyrene (HIPS) [ 82 , 83 ], and composite filaments [ 84 ]. Therefore, multi-material 3D printing using FDM has drawn growing interest in recent years.…”
Section: Systematic Review Of Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Természetesen szép számmal akadnak olyan publikációk is, amelyek valamely paraméter ütőmunkára gyakorolt hatásával foglalkoznak. Azonban fontos kiemelni, hogy ezen publikációk nagy többsége a 3D nyomtatási paraméterek ütőmunkára gyakorolt hatását hornyolt próbatestek esetében vizsgálta, mivel a feszültség gyűjtő hely jelenléte az ütőmunka drasztikus csökkenését idézi elő (Mishra et al, 2021). Számos publikáció foglalkozott a nyomtatás során alkalmazott kitöltés, kitöltési minta, nyomtatási sebesség, nyomtatási hőmérséklet, nyomtatási rétegvastagság és egyéb paraméterek mechanikai tulajdonságokra gyakorolt hatásával (Lennert-Sárosi, 2021;Wang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified