2019
DOI: 10.1108/bij-11-2018-0361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigational analysis on forecasting intraday values

Abstract: Purpose The algorithmic trading has advanced exponentially and necessitates the evaluation of intraday stock market forecasting on the grounds that any stock market series are foreseen to follow the random walk hypothesis. The purpose of this paper is to forecast the intraday values of stock indices using data mining techniques and compare the techniques’ performance in different markets to accomplish the best results. Design/methodology/approach This study investigates the intraday values (every 60th-minute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant features were determined by feature selection methods and the prediction was carried out with DT, ANN and SVM methods. Manickavasagam and Visalakshmi (2019) used MARS, SVM, ANN and autoregression methods from data mining methods to predict the stock index values of four different countries (the UK, Australia, India and China) between 2017 and 2018. The best success was obtained with the MARS algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant features were determined by feature selection methods and the prediction was carried out with DT, ANN and SVM methods. Manickavasagam and Visalakshmi (2019) used MARS, SVM, ANN and autoregression methods from data mining methods to predict the stock index values of four different countries (the UK, Australia, India and China) between 2017 and 2018. The best success was obtained with the MARS algorithm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He [22] proposes doubling the number of hidden neurons until the network's performance on the testing set deteriorates. For example, according to Manickavasagam [23], there should be at least five times the number of training facts as weights, which provides an upper limit on the total number of input and neurons. To test for these characteristics, this study applies multiple structures to all of the data, picking them at random, utilizing 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 neurons in the hidden layer to discover the optimal structure based on the index, and then examines the outcomes.…”
Section: Hidden Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%