1977
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.23.11.1234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Investment Strategy with Overshoot Rebates which Minimizes the Time to Attain a Specified Goal

Abstract: A strategy is developed which minimizes the expected time (or plays) to reach a given financial goal when "time rebates" are given if the goal is more than attained in the last investment period. It is shown that the optimal strategy is the one which maximizes the expected logarithm of the investment relative (for discrete distributions this is equivalent to maximizing the geometric mean). This strategy is optimal for all goals and levels of capital. When no time rebates are given, however, the proposed strate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Condition (2 ′ ) of Proposition 2.2 obviously implies Assumption 2.1 (2). Conversely, assume that Assumptions 2.1 are in force.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Condition (2 ′ ) of Proposition 2.2 obviously implies Assumption 2.1 (2). Conversely, assume that Assumptions 2.1 are in force.…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall frequently refer to the numéraire portfolio as the growth-optimal portfolio, as the two notions coincide. Assumption 2.1 (2) constitutes what has been coined a "favorable game" in [5] and it is necessary in order for the problem described in (2.3) to have finite value and therefore to be well-posed. Under Assumption 2.1 (2), and in view of the property X (x) = xX (1) for x ∈ R + , it is obvious that for all…”
Section: Standing Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expected time to reach a certain goal was considered inBreiman (1961) and the inclusion of a rebate in Aucamp (1977) implies that the GOP will minimize this time for finite levels of wealth.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is established at various levels of generality inBreiman (1961),Aucamp (1977),Heath and Sudderth (1984),Heath et al (1987),Browne (1999), andKardaras and Platen (2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%