2022
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.876814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Invitation to Greater Use of Matthews Correlation Coefficient in Robotics and Artificial Intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, MCC stands out as a statistical metric that yields a high score exclusively when all 4 diagnostic efficiency measures exhibit heightened values [ 36 ]. Since MCC offers greater informativeness and reliability, we computed this metric for all 6 risk scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MCC stands out as a statistical metric that yields a high score exclusively when all 4 diagnostic efficiency measures exhibit heightened values [ 36 ]. Since MCC offers greater informativeness and reliability, we computed this metric for all 6 risk scores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 21 was chosen as the state-of-the-art overall performance metric as it is robust against the uneven distribution of outcomes in datasets, and it is the most reliable classification metric for considering both positive and negative classes evenly. 22 MCC is more reliable than the Cohen k-statistic, Brier score, balanced accuracy (Bal Acc), and accuracy (Acc), because they are all influenced by the outcome prevalence, which varies across different clinical settings. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Also, it is more clinically relevant than the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 MCC is more reliable than the Cohen k-statistic, Brier score, balanced accuracy (Bal Acc), and accuracy (Acc), because they are all influenced by the outcome prevalence, which varies across different clinical settings. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Also, it is more clinically relevant than the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve. 23,30 If not explicitly reported, MCC was calculated as per 21,25 (Equation S3.1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we chose MCC over Cohen's kappa. An MCC that is well above zero indicates a performance that is better than random guessing [63]. A more detailed explanation of the three performance metrics and a brief discussion on the choice between MCC and Cohen's kappa are attached in the Appendix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%