2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16122082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ionic 1,4-Bis(styryl)benzene-Based Fluorescent Probe for Mercury(II) Detection in Water via Deprotection of the Thioacetal Group

Abstract: Highly sensitive and selective mercury detection in aqueous media is urgently needed because mercury poisoning usually results from exposure to water-soluble forms of mercury by inhalation and/or ingesting. An ionic conjugated oligoelectrolye (M1Q) based on 1,4-bis(styryl)benzene was synthesized as a fluorescent mercury(II) probe. The thioacetal moiety and quaternized ammonium group were incorporated for Hg2+ recognition and water solubility. A neutral Hg2+ probe (M1) was also prepared based on the same molecu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value was significantly lower than the maximum allowable mercury concentration (10.0 nM) by USEPA in drinking water [17]. The proposed method [30,[37][38][39][40][41]43], electrochemical sensor [42], spectrophotometric [44,48], colorimetry [45,49], chemiluminescence [46], single-crystal X-ray diffraction [47], electrochemiluminescence biosensor [50], X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [51], differential pulse voltammetry [36,52], ICP-OES [21], electrochemical [50] and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [53], in terms of LOD and LOQ (Table 4).…”
Section: Respectivelymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value was significantly lower than the maximum allowable mercury concentration (10.0 nM) by USEPA in drinking water [17]. The proposed method [30,[37][38][39][40][41]43], electrochemical sensor [42], spectrophotometric [44,48], colorimetry [45,49], chemiluminescence [46], single-crystal X-ray diffraction [47], electrochemiluminescence biosensor [50], X-ray fluorescence (XRF) [51], differential pulse voltammetry [36,52], ICP-OES [21], electrochemical [50] and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [53], in terms of LOD and LOQ (Table 4).…”
Section: Respectivelymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Recently, several molecular probe-based sensors using organic chromophores, quantum dots (QDs), small fluorescent organic molecules, proteins, antibodies and conjugated polymers coupled with several spectrometric and electrochemical techniques are reported for mercury(II) determination [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Some of these methods suffere from solubility issues, low stability, lower sensitivity and selectivity, complicated synthesis procedures and environmentally unfriendliness to monitor mercury(II) in biological and environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to verify the detected The results show that the fluorescence intensity increases linearly with an increasing Hg 2+ and Pb 2+ concentration over the ranges of 10~250 nM (i.e., 2.0~50 ppb) and 10~100 nM (i.e., 2.1~20.7 ppb), respectively. Moreover, the 3.3σ/slope was used to determine the limits of detection (LoD), where σ is the standard deviation of the response [53,54]. The LoD of Hg 2+ and Pb 2+ is equal to 0.70 ppb and 0.53 ppb, respectively.…”
Section: Mixing Performance Of Microfluidic Device and Quenching Efficiency Of Go/aptamer Suspensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%