An ISO 26262 Compliant Design Flow and Tool for Automotive Multicore Systems

Trei, Maria; Maro, Salome; Steghöfer, Jan-Philipp; Peikenkamp, Thomas

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_11

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To enable software engineers to acquire time data assisting in identifying sources and paths of noise and vibration, Rinaldi et al 18 developed a unique MATLAB‐based coded engineering software tool called Time‐Frequency Analyzer Core (TFAC); furthermore, a unique software tool for automotive NVH troubleshooting was developed by the authors in Reference 19. Considering that the model‐based design processes in the automotive software development must support the automotive functional safety standard ISO 26262, Trei et al 20 developed ISO 26262 compliant design flow and corresponding tool for multicore automotive software.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

AutoToolVCC: Variable consistency check tool for automotive software projects

Xie

Wang

He³

et al. 2020

Softw Pract Exp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Automotive software systems have become increasingly complex and huge, leading to long development cycle and increased development difficulty. When a complete automotive software project has reached a scale of several gigabytes, the complicated development process is prone to produce the following two irregular problems: (1) variable inconsistency problem and (2) code coexistence problem. These irregular problems may eventually lead to serious consequences, such as car crashes. In response to the above irregular problems, we develop a variable consistency check tool called AutoToolVCC for automotive software projects. AutoToolVCC divides the variable consistency check process into two stages: (1) extracting all variable information from the automotive software project and (2) checking the consistency of the variables through the variable preprocessing technique and the variable attribute check technique. After an actual check of multiple automotive software projects (approximately 500–1000 MB in size) provided by an automotive manufacturer, the accuracy of variable consistency check is as high as 100%, and the check time only takes about 10–30 s, whereas the pervious plain method needs 100–600 s.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

AutoToolVCC: Variable consistency check tool for automotive software projects

Xie

Wang

He³

et al. 2020

Softw Pract Exp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first attempt to provide a full framework that parses the standards and translates them into a graphical BPMN model to facilitate adoption. Whereas many works have proposed frameworks to ensure compliance with the ISO 26262 standard, e.g., [11], [12], referred approaches mostly target the assurance process management, likely assuming intervention of standard experts. A similar work proposing standard modeling is the OpenCoss framework [13]: it provides means to share a non-ambiguous and formal interpretation of standards but the modeling activity is manually conducted what, being time-consuming and error-prone, does not ease adoption.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Facilitating the Adoption of Standards through Model-Based Representation

Adedjouma

Pedroza

Smaoui

et al. 2018

2018 23rd International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays standards provide recommendations for system development process in various phases and activities, aiming to address and reduce the risks associated to poor or flawed designs. Indeed, to increase systems assurance levels, a variety of concerns like safety, security and reliability are currently considered as critical and targeted by standards. However, to ensure such assurance levels, all stakeholders involved in the product development cycle (manufacturers, regulators, etc.) need to have a clear understanding of the standards contents. This paper presents an approach that aims to ease the common understanding of standards and their adoption by automatically generating models from them. The approach mostly relies upon the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) language. The potential benefits of this structured graphical view of standards are to facilitate their comprehension, visualization and navigation by the stakeholders involved in product development cycle.

show abstract